Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
silverwind
b18c047d62
Upgrade gopls to v0.19.0, add make fix (#34772)
Upgrade to
[v0.19.0](https://github.com/golang/tools/releases/tag/gopls%2Fv0.19.0)
and fix issues. Runs with new `warning` serverity setting. This likely
does less checks than before. Additionally, add `make fix` which runs
modernize. This is also verified on CI.

For the record, here are the issues discoverd when running with `info`
severity, in case we want to fix these:

```
tests/integration/repo_test.go:95:5-14: could use tagged switch on i
tests/integration/api_packages_generic_test.go:149:4-64: could use tagged switch on setting.Packages.Storage.Type
services/webhook/msteams_test.go:33:4-33: could use tagged switch on fact.Name
services/webhook/msteams_test.go:59:4-33: could use tagged switch on fact.Name
services/webhook/msteams_test.go:85:4-33: could use tagged switch on fact.Name
services/webhook/msteams_test.go:111:4-33: could use tagged switch on fact.Name
services/webhook/msteams_test.go:138:4-33: could use tagged switch on fact.Name
services/webhook/msteams_test.go:161:4-33: could use tagged switch on fact.Name
services/webhook/msteams_test.go:187:4-33: could use tagged switch on fact.Name
services/webhook/msteams_test.go:213:4-33: could use tagged switch on fact.Name
services/webhook/msteams_test.go:239:4-33: could use tagged switch on fact.Name
services/webhook/msteams_test.go:266:4-33: could use tagged switch on fact.Name
services/webhook/msteams_test.go:407:4-33: could use tagged switch on fact.Name
tests/integration/api_packages_conan_test.go:350:6-33: could use tagged switch on pf.Name
models/issues/tracked_time_test.go:98:3-18: could use tagged switch on user.ID
tests/integration/api_token_test.go:505:5-43: could use tagged switch on minRequiredLevel
services/gitdiff/gitdiff.go:220:33-46: method "getLineLegacy" is unused
```

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2025-06-18 19:30:40 +00:00
TheFox0x7
cc1fdc84ca
Use test context in tests and new loop system in benchmarks (#33648)
Replace all contexts in tests with go1.24 t.Context()

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2025-02-20 09:57:40 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
408a484224
Adjust object format interface (#28469)
- Remove `ObjectFormatID`
- Remove function `ObjectFormatFromID`.
- Use `Sha1ObjectFormat` directly but not a pointer because it's an
empty struct.
- Store `ObjectFormatName` in `repository` struct
2023-12-17 11:56:08 +00:00
Adam Majer
cbf923e87b
Abstract hash function usage (#28138)
Refactor Hash interfaces and centralize hash function. This will allow
easier introduction of different hash function later on.

This forms the "no-op" part of the SHA256 enablement patch.
2023-12-13 21:02:00 +00:00
CaiCandong
815d267c80
Fix verifyCommits error when push a new branch (#26664)
> ### Description
> If a new branch is pushed, and the repository has a rule that would
require signed commits for the new branch, the commit is rejected with a
500 error regardless of whether it's signed.
> 
> When pushing a new branch, the "old" commit is the empty ID
(0000000000000000000000000000000000000000). verifyCommits has no
provision for this and passes an invalid commit range to git rev-list.
Prior to 1.19 this wasn't an issue because only pre-existing individual
branches could be protected.
> 
> I was able to reproduce with
[try.gitea.io/CraigTest/test](https://try.gitea.io/CraigTest/test),
which is set up with a blanket rule to require commits on all branches.


Fix #25565
Very thanks to @Craig-Holmquist-NTI for reporting the bug and suggesting
an valid solution!

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-08-30 02:27:53 +00:00