The new directives {proxy,fastcgi,scgi,uwsgi,memcached}_next_upstream_tries
and {proxy,fastcgi,scgi,uwsgi,memcached}_next_upstream_timeout limit
the number of upstreams tried and the maximum time spent for these tries
when searching for a valid upstream.
Previously, upstream's status code was overwritten with
cached response's status code when STALE or REVALIDATED
response was sent to the client.
Signed-off-by: Piotr Sikora <piotr@cloudflare.com>
The following new directives are introduced: proxy_cache_revalidate,
fastcgi_cache_revalidate, scgi_cache_revalidate, uwsgi_cache_revalidate.
Default is off. When set to on, they enable cache revalidation using
conditional requests with If-Modified-Since for expired cache items.
As of now, no attempts are made to merge headers given in a 304 response
during cache revalidation with headers previously stored in a cache item.
Headers in a 304 response are only used to calculate new validity time
of a cache item.
The parameter is mostly identical to http_404, and is expected to
be used in similar situations. The 403 code might be returned by
a backend instead of 404 on initial sync of new directories with rsync.
See here for feature request and additional details:
http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx-ru/2013-April/050920.html
The "proxy_bind", "fastcgi_bind", "uwsgi_bind", "scgi_bind" and
"memcached_bind" directives are now inherited; inherited value
can be reset by the "off" parameter. Duplicate directives are
now detected. Parameter value can now contain variables.
Failing to do so results in problems if 400 or 414 requests are
redirected to fastcgi/scgi/uwsgi upstream, as well as after invalid
headers got from upstream. This was already fixed for proxy in r3478,
but fastcgi (the only affected protocol at that time) was missed.
Reported by Matthieu Tourne.
This resulted in a disclosure of previously freed memory if upstream
server returned specially crafted response, potentially exposing
sensitive information.
Reported by Matthew Daley.
The SCGI specification doesn't specify format of the response, and assuming
CGI specs should be used there is no reason to complain. RFC 3875
explicitly states that "A Status header field is optional, and status
200 'OK' is assumed if it is omitted".
The r->http_version is a version of client's request, and modules must
not set it unless they are really willing to downgrade protocol version
used for a response (i.e. to HTTP/0.9 if no response headers are available).
In neither case r->http_version may be upgraded.
The former code downgraded response from HTTP/1.1 to HTTP/1.0 for no reason,
causing various problems (see ticket #66). It was also possible that
HTTP/0.9 requests were upgraded to HTTP/1.0.
The following problems were fixed:
1. Directive fastcgi_cache affected headers sent to backends in unrelated
servers / locations (see ticket #45).
2. If-Unmodified-Since, If-Match and If-Range headers were sent to backends
if fastcgi_cache was used.
3. Cache-related headers were sent to backends if there were no fastcgi_param
directives and fastcgi_cache was used at server level.
