From 1245cd175283b11800bbbdc52287957cc3d76417 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Roman Donchenko <roman.donchenko@itseez.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:03:48 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] NearestNeighborTest: use ts->get_rng() instead of (implicit)
 theRNG()

This ensures that test data is not dependent on the order the tests are
executed in.
---
 modules/features2d/test/test_nearestneighbors.cpp | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/modules/features2d/test/test_nearestneighbors.cpp b/modules/features2d/test/test_nearestneighbors.cpp
index 8d1ecfd79a..c03a357065 100644
--- a/modules/features2d/test/test_nearestneighbors.cpp
+++ b/modules/features2d/test/test_nearestneighbors.cpp
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ int NearestNeighborTest::checkFind( const Mat& data )
 void NearestNeighborTest::run( int /*start_from*/ ) {
     int code = cvtest::TS::OK, tempCode;
     Mat desc( featuresCount, dims, CV_32FC1 );
-    randu( desc, Scalar(minValue), Scalar(maxValue) );
+    ts->get_rng().fill( desc, RNG::UNIFORM, minValue, maxValue );
 
     createModel( desc );