Commit Graph

25139 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Maksim Shabunin
2d9c0c8592 C-API cleanup: core module tests 2024-11-11 14:53:09 +03:00
Gursimar Singh
979428d590
Merge pull request #26334 from gursimarsingh:dnn_engine_change
Modify DNN Samples to use ENGINE_CLASSIC for Non-Default Back-end or Target #26334

PR resolves #26325 regarding fall-back to ENGINE_CLASSIC if non-default back-end or target is passed by user.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist

See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request

- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
      Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
2024-11-08 08:58:35 +03:00
Dmitry Kurtaev
a7bb17b092
Merge pull request #26399 from dkurt:dk/file_storage_new_data
int64 data type in FileStorage #26399

### Pull Request Readiness Checklist

resolves #23333

Proposed approach is not perfect in terms of complexity and potential bugs. Instead of changing `INT` raw size from `4` to `8`, we check int64 value can be fitted to int32 or not.

Collections such as cv::Mat rely on data type symbol.

This PR is addressed to 5.x branch first to cover `CV_64S` Mat. Later, it can be backported to 4.x

See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request

- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
      Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
2024-11-08 08:27:59 +03:00
Alexander Smorkalov
03983549fc Merge branch 4.x 2024-11-06 08:20:12 +03:00
Dmitry Kurtaev
286f7524bb
Merge pull request #26420 from dkurt:fs_mat_0d_1d
Support 0d/1d Mat in FileStorage #26420

### Pull Request Readiness Checklist

See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request

- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
      Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
2024-11-06 08:11:59 +03:00
Maksim Shabunin
25b67bc99e highgui: drop legacy waitkey behavior 2024-11-05 15:01:53 +03:00
Alexander Smorkalov
55105719dd
Merge pull request #26396 from hanliutong:rvv-fp16-m2
Use LMUL=2 in the RISC-V Vector (RVV) FP16 part. (5.x)
2024-11-02 13:30:31 +03:00
Vadim Pisarevsky
853fa9dd40
Merge pull request #26400 from vpisarev:fix_fp16_cmp
Fixed FP16 mat comparison in tests #26400

make sure that if both compared FP16/BF16 values are bitwise-equal, assume their difference to be 0 (zero), just like in the case of FP32 and FP64, don't try to compare them as floating-point numbers, because they can be NaN's.

**fixes** #24894

- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
      Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
2024-11-02 12:07:48 +03:00
Vadim Pisarevsky
df06d2eac2
Merge pull request #26254 from vpisarev:extra_tests_for_reshape
Added extra tests for reshape #26254

Attempt to reproduce problems described in #25174. No success; everything works as expected. Probably, the function has been used improperly. Slightly modified the code of Mat::reshape() to provide better diagnostic.

- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
      Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
2024-11-01 11:37:56 +03:00
Alexander Smorkalov
ee95bfe244
Merge pull request #26203 from FantasqueX:generic-simd-warpAffineBlocklineNN
Use generic SIMD in warpAffineBlocklineNN
2024-11-01 11:16:51 +03:00
Liutong HAN
a59a66a2c7 Use LMUL=2 in the RISC-V Vector (RVV) FP16 part. 2024-11-01 07:05:25 +00:00
Alexander Smorkalov
a95658f106
Merge pull request #26383 from mshabunin:fix-samples-cpp-17
build: raise min cmake version to 3.13 in other places
2024-10-31 09:34:28 +03:00
Vincent Rabaud
265a2c39b2 Fix test typo. 2024-10-30 15:05:30 +01:00
Maksim Shabunin
e44e3ab0a7 build: raise min cmake version to 3.13 in other places 2024-10-30 14:39:04 +03:00
Vadim Pisarevsky
299aa14c4b fixed typo in bfloat<=>float conversion test 2024-10-29 20:06:11 +03:00
Maksim Shabunin
7654d06b83 WinRT/UWP build: fix more warnings in media part 2024-10-29 19:19:09 +03:00
Dmitry Kurtaev
0e80a97f87
Hotfix ie_ngraph.cpp in Debug 2024-10-29 10:20:51 +03:00
WU Jia
66a29b422c
Merge pull request #25708 from kaingwade:flann2annoy
Add interface to Annoy which will replace the FLANN #25708

This PR is to add interface to [Annoy](https://github.com/spotify/annoy) which will replace the FLANN, part of one of the cleanup work of OpenCV 5.0: #24998. 

After it, there will be consecutive patches:

- [ ] Add Annoy based DescriptorMatcher
- [ ] Replace FLANN based code with Annoy and remove FLANN completely

### Pull Request Readiness Checklist

See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request

- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
      Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
2024-10-28 17:04:02 +03:00
alexlyulkov
a2fa1d49a4
Merge pull request #26208 from alexlyulkov:al/new-engine-caffe-parser
Modified Caffe parser to support the new dnn engine #26208

Now the Caffe parser supports both the old and the new engine. It can be selected using newEngine argument in PopulateNet.

All cpu Caffe tests work fine except:

- Test_Caffe_nets.Colorization
- Test_Caffe_layers.FasterRCNN_Proposal

Both these tests doesn't work because of the bug in the new net.forward function. The function takes the name of the desired target last layer, but uses this name as the name of the desired output tensor.
Also Colorization test contains a strange model with a Silence layer in the end, so it doesn't have outputs. The old parser just ignored it. I think, the proper solution is to run this model until the (number_of_layers - 2) layer using proper net.forward arguments in the test.

### Pull Request Readiness Checklist

See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request

- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
      Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
2024-10-28 11:32:07 +03:00
Gursimar Singh
f217656916
Merge pull request #25349 from gursimarsingh:videocapture_samples_cpp
combined videocapture and videowriter samples  for cleanup
2024-10-28 09:57:54 +03:00
Kumataro
3b01a4d4e9
Merge pull request #26373 from Kumataro:fix26372
doc: fix doxygen errors at Algorithm and QRCodeEncoder #26373

Close https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/26372

### Pull Request Readiness Checklist

See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request

- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
      Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
2024-10-28 09:20:04 +03:00
Alexander Smorkalov
8a5ec4bf7b
Merge pull request #26287 from mshabunin:cpp-17
build: transition to C++17, minor changes in documentation
2024-10-26 19:59:48 +03:00
Wanli
29e712ed93
Merge pull request #26369 from WanliZhong:5x_fix_hfloat_vfunc
Fix hfloat conflicts of v_func in merging 4.x to 5.x #26369

This PR solves the conflicts in merging 4.x to 5.x https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/26358
1. Explicitly convert the inputs number for `v_setall_` to hfloat number
2. Loosens the threshold for `v_sincos` test. (related issue: https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/26362)
3. Remove the new but temp api `template <> inline v_float16x8 v_setall_(float v) { return v_setall_f16((hfloat)v); }`

### Pull Request Readiness Checklist

See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request

- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
      Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
2024-10-26 19:54:13 +03:00
Maksim Shabunin
52100328d8 WinRT/UWP build: fix some specific warnings 2024-10-25 22:32:44 +03:00
Alexander Smorkalov
05e7988e9c
Merge pull request #26367 from alexlyulkovЖal/forward-to-layer-assert
Added exception when calling forward to specified layer with the new dnn engine
2024-10-25 15:22:09 +03:00
Maksim Shabunin
d223e796f5 build: transition to C++17, minor changes in documentation 2024-10-25 15:05:14 +03:00
Alexander Lyulkov
3a4c88c33e Added exception when calling forward to specified layer with the new dnn engine 2024-10-25 13:00:15 +03:00
Alexander Smorkalov
8e55659afe Merge branch 4.x 2024-10-24 15:10:43 +03:00
Liutong HAN
35571be570
Merge pull request #26318 from hanliutong:rvv-intrin-m2
Use LMUL=2 in the RISC-V Vector (RVV) backend of Universal Intrinsic. #26318

The modification of this patch involves the RVV backend of Universal Intrinsic, replacing `LMUL=1` with `LMUL=2`.

Now each Universal Intrinsic type actually corresponds to two RVV vector registers, and each Intrinsic function also operates two vector registers. Considering that algorithms written using Universal Intrinsic usually do not use the maximum number of registers, this can help the RVV backend utilize more register resources without modifying the algorithm implementation

This patch is generally beneficial in performance.

We compiled OpenCV with `Clang-19.1.1` and `GCC-14.2.0` , ran it on `CanMV-k230` and `Banana-Pi F3`. Then we have four scenarios on combinations of compilers and devices. In `opencv_perf_core`, there are 3363 cases, of which:
- 901 (26.8%) cases achieved more than `5%` performance improvement in all four scenarios, and the average speedup of these test cases (compared to scalar) increased from `3.35x` to `4.35x`
- 75 (2.2%) cases had more than `5%` performance loss in all four scenarios, indicating that these cases are better with `LMUL=1` instead of `LMUL=2`. This involves `Mat_Transform`, `hasNonZero`, `KMeans`, `meanStdDev`, `merge` and `norm2`. Among them, `Mat_Transform` only has performance degradation in a few cases (`8UC3`), and the actual execution time of `hasNonZero` is so short that it can be ignored. For `KMeans`, `meanStdDev`, `merge` and `norm2`, we should be able to use the HAL to optimize/restore their performance. (In fact, we have already done this for `merge`  #26216 )

### Pull Request Readiness Checklist

See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request

- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
      Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
2024-10-24 10:08:43 +03:00
Dmitry Kurtaev
d193554a5f OpenVINO friendly output names from non-compiled Model 2024-10-23 09:29:05 +03:00
Alexander Smorkalov
898a2a3811
Merge pull request #26353 from asmorkalov:as/ade_1.2e
ADE update to 0.1.2e
2024-10-23 08:10:16 +03:00
Alexander Smorkalov
983086411f ADE update to 0.1.2e 2024-10-22 17:45:00 +03:00
Alexander Smorkalov
9f0c3f5b2b
Merge pull request #26327 from asmorkalov:as/drop_convertFp16
Finally dropped convertFp16 function in favor of cv::Mat::convertTo() #26327 

Partially address https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/24909
Related PR to contrib: https://github.com/opencv/opencv_contrib/pull/3812

### Pull Request Readiness Checklist

See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request

- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
      Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
2024-10-22 15:17:24 +03:00
Alexander Smorkalov
57ccbee25d
Merge pull request #26245 from cudawarped:cuda_update_to_npp_stream_ctx
cuda - update npp calls to use the new NppStreamContext API if available
2024-10-22 14:44:42 +03:00
alexlyulkov
a40ceff215
Merge pull request #26330 from alexlyulkov:al/new-engine-tflite-parser2
Modified TFLite parser for the new dnn engine #26330

The new dnn graph is creating just by defining input and output names of each layer.
Some TFLite layers has fused activation, which doesn't have layer name and input and output names. Also some layers require additional preprocessing layers (e.g. NHWC -> NCHW). All these layers should be added to the graph with some unique layer and input and output names. 

I solve this problem by adding additionalPreLayer and additionalPostLayer layers.

If a layer has a fused activation, I add additionalPostLayer and change input and output names this way:
**original**: conv_relu(conv123, conv123_input, conv123_output)
**new**: conv(conv123, conv123_input, conv123_output_additional_post_layer) + relu(conv123_relu,  conv1_output_additional_post_layer, conv123_output)

If a layer has additional preprocessing layer, I change input and output names this way:
**original**: permute_reshape(reshape345, reshape345_input, reshape345_output)
**new**: permute(reshape345_permute, reshape345_input, reshape345_input_additional_pre_layer) + reshape(reshape345, reshape345_input_additional_pre_layer, reshape345_output)


### Pull Request Readiness Checklist

See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request

- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
      Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
2024-10-22 09:05:58 +03:00
Alexander Smorkalov
94d5ad09ff
Merge pull request #26284 from fzuuzf:enum_arithmetic_fixes_for_c++26
C++26 Deprecated Enum Arithmetic Conversion: Fix core/mat.inl.hpp
2024-10-21 15:47:53 +03:00
Alexander Smorkalov
e026a5ad8a
Merge pull request #26281 from kallaballa:clgl_device_discovery
Rewrote OpenCL-OpenGL-interop device discovery routine without extensions and with Apple support
2024-10-18 15:52:17 +03:00
Alexander Smorkalov
c79b72a838
Merge pull request #26335 from migueldaipre:4.x
fix: performance typo
2024-10-18 15:44:32 +03:00
Vadim Pisarevsky
6e3c5db1c6
Merge pull request #26333 from vpisarev:fix_26322
Fix #26322: construction of another Mat header for empty matrix #26333

The PR fixes #26322

- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
      Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
2024-10-18 14:50:27 +03:00
Vadim Pisarevsky
2f35847960
Merge pull request #26321 from vpisarev:better_bfloat
2x more accurate float => bfloat conversion #26321

There is a magic trick to make float => bfloat conversion more accurate (_original reference needed, is it done this way in PyTorch?_). In simplified form it looks like:

```
uint16_t f2bf(float x) {
    union {
        unsigned u;
        float f;
    } u;
    u.f = x;
    // return (uint16_t)(u.u >> 16); <== the old method before this patch
    return (uint16_t)((u.u + 0x8000) >> 16);
} 
```

it works correctly for almost all valid floating-point values, positive, zero or negative, and even for some extreme cases, like `+/-inf`, `nan` etc. The addition of `0x8000` to integer representation of 32-bit float before retrieving the highest 16 bits reduces the rounding error by ~2x.

The slight problem with this improved method is that the numbers very close to or equal to `+/-FLT_MAX` are mistakenly converted to `+/-inf`, respectively.

This patch implements improved algorithm for `float => bfloat` conversion in scalar and vector form; it fixes the above-mentioned problem using some extra bit magic, i.e. 0x8000 is not added to very big (by absolute value) numbers:

```
// the actual implementation is more efficient,
// without conditions or floating-point operations, see the source code
return (uint16_t)(u.u + (fabsf(x) <= big_threshold ? 0x8000 : 0)) >> 16);
```

The corresponding test has been added as well and this is output from the test:

```
[----------] 1 test from Core_BFloat
[ RUN      ] Core_BFloat.convert
maxerr0 = 0.00774842, mean0 = 0.00190643, stddev0 = 0.00186063
maxerr1 = 0.00389057, mean1 = 0.000952614, stddev1 = 0.000931268
[       OK ] Core_BFloat.convert (7 ms)
```

Here `maxerr0, mean0, stddev0` are for the original method and `maxerr1, mean1, stddev1` are for the new method. As you can see, there is a significant improvement in accuracy.

**Note:**

_Actually, on ~32,000,000 random FP32 numbers with uniformly distributed sign, exponent and mantissa the new method is always at least as accurate as the old one._

The test also checks all the corner cases, where we see no degradation either vs the original method.

- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
      Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
2024-10-18 14:46:40 +03:00
Kumataro
35dbf32227
Merge pull request #26211 from Kumataro:fix26207
imgcodecs: implement imencodemulti() #26211

Close #26207
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist

See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request

- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
      Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
2024-10-18 14:44:55 +03:00
Miguel Daipré
888469a842
fix: performance typo 2024-10-18 08:37:32 -03:00
Septimiu Neaga
3919f33e21
Merge pull request #26293 from SeptimiuIoachimNeagaIntel:EISW-140103_optimization_flag
G-API: Introduce level optimization flag for ONNXRT backend #26293

### Pull Request Readiness Checklist

See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request

- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
      Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
2024-10-17 10:22:08 +03:00
FantasqueX
489df18a13
Merge pull request #26313 from FantasqueX:ipp-warp-affine-border-value
Use border value in ipp version of warp affine #26313

### Pull Request Readiness Checklist

See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request

- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
      Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
2024-10-17 08:50:30 +03:00
Vadim Pisarevsky
3cd57ea09e
Merge pull request #26056 from vpisarev:new_dnn_engine
New dnn engine #26056

This is the 1st PR with the new engine; CI is green and PR is ready to be merged, I think.
Merge together with https://github.com/opencv/opencv_contrib/pull/3794

---

**Known limitations:**
* [solved] OpenVINO is temporarily disabled, but is probably easy to restore (it's not a deal breaker to merge this PR, I guess)
* The new engine does not support any backends nor any targets except for the default CPU implementation. But it's possible to choose the old engine when loading a model, then all the functionality is available.
* [Caffe patch is here: #26208] The new engine only supports ONNX. When a model is constructed manually or is loaded from a file of different format (.tf, .tflite, .caffe, .darknet), the old engine is used.
* Even in the case of ONNX some layers are not supported by the new engine, such as all quantized layers (including DequantizeLinear, QuantizeLinear, QLinearConv etc.), LSTM, GRU, .... It's planned, of course, to have full support for ONNX by OpenCV 5.0 gold release. When a loaded model contains unsupported layers, we switch to the old engine automatically  (at ONNX parsing time, not at `forward()` time).
* Some layers , e.g. Expat, are only partially supported by the new engine. In the case of unsupported flavours it switches to the old engine automatically (at ONNX parsing time, not at `forward()` time).
* 'Concat' graph optimization is disabled. The optimization eliminates Concat layer and instead makes the layers that generate tensors to be concatenated to write the outputs to the final destination. Of course, it's only possible when `axis=0` or `axis=N=1`. The optimization is not compatible with dynamic shapes since we need to know in advance where to store the tensors. Because some of the layer implementations have been modified to become more compatible with the new engine, the feature appears to be broken even when the old engine is used.
* Some `dnn::Net` API is not available with the new engine. Also, shape inference may return false if some of the output or intermediate tensors' shapes cannot be inferred without running the model. Probably this can be fixed by a dummy run of the model with zero inputs.
* Some overloads of `dnn::Net::getFLOPs()` and `dnn::Net::getMemoryConsumption()` are not exposed any longer in wrapper generators; but the most useful overloads are exposed (and checked by Java tests).
* [in progress] A few Einsum tests related to empty shapes have been disabled due to crashes in the tests and in Einsum implementations. The code and the tests need to be repaired.
* OpenCL implementation of Deconvolution is disabled. It's very bad and very slow anyway; need to be completely revised.
* Deconvolution3D test is now skipped, because it was only supported by CUDA and OpenVINO backends, both of which are not supported by the new engine.
* Some tests, such as FastNeuralStyle, checked that the in the case of CUDA backend there is no fallback to CPU. Currently all layers in the new engine are processed on CPU, so there are many fallbacks. The checks, therefore, have been temporarily disabled.

---

- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
      Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
2024-10-16 15:28:19 +03:00
Yuantao Feng
12738deaef
Merge pull request #26271 from fengyuentau:imgproc/warpperspective_opt
imgproc: add optimized warpPerspective linear kernels for inputs of type CV_8U/16U/32F+C1/C3/C4

Merge with https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1214

## Performance

### Apple Mac Mini (M2, 16GB memory)

```
Geometric mean (ms)

                                      Name of Test                                        base  patch   patch   
                                                                                                          vs    
                                                                                                         base   
                                                                                                      (x-factor)
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 8UC1)      0.397 0.119    3.34   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 16UC1)     0.412 0.155    2.65   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 32FC1)     0.382 0.134    2.85   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 8UC3)      0.562 0.201    2.80   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 16UC3)     0.580 0.279    2.07   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 32FC3)     0.477 0.269    1.78   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 8UC4)      0.536 0.221    2.43   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 16UC4)     0.662 0.328    2.02   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 32FC4)     0.511 0.325    1.57   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 8UC1)     0.433 0.171    2.54   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 16UC1)    0.452 0.204    2.21   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 32FC1)    0.410 0.180    2.27   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 8UC3)     0.624 0.243    2.57   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 16UC3)    0.636 0.331    1.92   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 32FC3)    0.511 0.315    1.62   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 8UC4)     0.604 0.281    2.15   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 16UC4)    0.712 0.393    1.81   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 32FC4)    0.552 0.368    1.50   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 8UC1)     0.768 0.214    3.58   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 16UC1)    0.743 0.260    2.86   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 32FC1)    0.722 0.235    3.07   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 8UC3)     1.091 0.333    3.28   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 16UC3)    1.035 0.453    2.29   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 32FC3)    0.955 0.442    2.16   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 8UC4)     1.097 0.364    3.01   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 16UC4)    1.141 0.547    2.09   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 32FC4)    1.015 0.591    1.72   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 8UC1)    1.012 1.006    1.01   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 16UC1)   0.996 1.060    0.94   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 32FC1)   0.930 0.993    0.94   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 8UC3)    1.560 1.260    1.24   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 16UC3)   1.374 1.410    0.97   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 32FC3)   1.212 1.292    0.94   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 8UC4)    1.702 1.354    1.26   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 16UC4)   1.554 1.522    1.02   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 32FC4)   1.342 1.435    0.94   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 8UC1)    1.561 0.364    4.29   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 16UC1)   1.444 0.406    3.56   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 32FC1)   1.423 0.394    3.61   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 8UC3)    2.177 0.533    4.08   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 16UC3)   2.006 0.689    2.91   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 32FC3)   1.907 0.688    2.77   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 8UC4)    2.213 0.581    3.81   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 16UC4)   2.238 0.810    2.76   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 32FC4)   2.072 1.055    1.96   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 8UC1)   2.201 2.908    0.76   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 16UC1)  2.108 2.951    0.71   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 32FC1)  1.997 2.840    0.70   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 8UC3)   3.444 3.293    1.05   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 16UC3)  2.889 3.417    0.85   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 32FC3)  2.671 3.354    0.80   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 8UC4)   3.765 3.767    1.00   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 16UC4)  3.247 3.962    0.82   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 32FC4)  2.993 3.669    0.82   
```

### Desktop (i7-12700K, 64GB memory)

```
Geometric mean (ms)

                                      Name of Test                                        base  patch   patch   
                                                                                                          vs    
                                                                                                         base   
                                                                                                      (x-factor)
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 8UC1)      0.274 0.076    3.62   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 16UC1)     0.299 0.058    5.14   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 32FC1)     0.299 0.043    6.90   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 8UC3)      0.330 0.115    2.87   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 16UC3)     0.480 0.109    4.39   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 32FC3)     0.608 0.180    3.37   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 8UC4)      0.317 0.143    2.21   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 16UC4)     0.704 0.139    5.07   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 32FC4)     0.508 0.141    3.60   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 8UC1)     0.293 0.064    4.57   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 16UC1)    0.311 0.061    5.07   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 32FC1)    0.299 0.057    5.29   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 8UC3)     0.373 0.135    2.75   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 16UC3)    0.501 0.129    3.87   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 32FC3)    0.403 0.123    3.26   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 8UC4)     0.372 0.163    2.28   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 16UC4)    0.582 0.161    3.63   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 32FC4)    0.459 0.152    3.03   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 8UC1)     0.558 0.099    5.63   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 16UC1)    0.607 0.098    6.20   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 32FC1)    0.599 0.090    6.65   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 8UC3)     0.636 0.198    3.22   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 16UC3)    0.806 0.187    4.31   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 32FC3)    1.329 0.227    5.85   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 8UC4)     0.643 0.238    2.70   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 16UC4)    1.401 0.233    6.02   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 32FC4)    1.083 0.229    4.72   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 8UC1)    0.682 0.358    1.91   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 16UC1)   0.695 0.350    1.99   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 32FC1)   0.666 0.334    2.00   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 8UC3)    0.895 0.502    1.78   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 16UC3)   1.035 0.492    2.11   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 32FC3)   0.924 0.466    1.98   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 8UC4)    0.969 0.551    1.76   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 16UC4)   1.201 0.550    2.18   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 32FC4)   0.948 0.544    1.74   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 8UC1)    1.018 0.174    5.84   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 16UC1)   0.973 0.173    5.63   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 32FC1)   1.002 0.164    6.13   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 8UC3)    1.100 0.297    3.71   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 16UC3)   1.197 0.278    4.30   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 32FC3)   3.108 0.296   10.49   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 8UC4)    1.086 0.340    3.20   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 16UC4)   2.987 0.336    8.88   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 32FC4)   2.249 0.835    2.69   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 8UC1)   1.330 1.007    1.32   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 16UC1)  1.352 0.974    1.39   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 32FC1)  1.241 0.933    1.33   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 8UC3)   1.896 1.287    1.47   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 16UC3)  2.071 1.288    1.61   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 32FC3)  1.870 1.211    1.54   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 8UC4)   2.059 1.362    1.51   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 16UC4)  2.366 1.395    1.70   
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 32FC4)  1.859 1.416    1.31   
```

### Khadas VIM3 (A311D, 4xA73+2xA53, no fp16 vector intrinsics support, 4GB memory)

```
Geometric mean (ms)

                                      Name of Test                                         base  patch    patch
                                                                                                            vs
                                                                                                           base
                                                                                                        (x-factor)
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 8UC1)      2.543  0.702     3.62
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 16UC1)     3.175  0.727     4.37
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 32FC1)     2.877  0.777     3.70
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 8UC3)      4.059  1.192     3.41
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 16UC3)     4.689  1.642     2.86
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 32FC3)     4.071  2.064     1.97
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 8UC4)      3.897  1.501     2.60
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 16UC4)     5.485  2.106     2.60
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 32FC4)     4.611  2.938     1.57
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 8UC1)     2.717  0.912     2.98
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 16UC1)    3.426  0.885     3.87
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 32FC1)    3.009  0.979     3.07
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 8UC3)     4.409  1.488     2.96
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 16UC3)    5.236  1.901     2.75
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 32FC3)    4.445  2.232     1.99
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 8UC4)     4.400  1.816     2.42
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 16UC4)    6.211  2.390     2.60
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(640x480, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 32FC4)    4.779  3.154     1.52
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 8UC1)     5.487  1.599     3.43
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 16UC1)    6.589  1.652     3.99
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 32FC1)    4.916  1.779     2.76
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 8UC3)     7.676  2.465     3.11
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 16UC3)    8.783  3.020     2.91
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 32FC3)    8.468  4.314     1.96
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 8UC4)     7.670  2.944     2.60
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 16UC4)    9.364  3.871     2.42
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 32FC4)    9.297  5.770     1.61
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 8UC1)    6.809  5.359     1.27
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 16UC1)   9.010  4.745     1.90
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 32FC1)   8.501  4.712     1.80
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 8UC3)    10.652 7.345     1.45
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 16UC3)   12.319 7.647     1.61
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 32FC3)   10.466 7.849     1.33
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 8UC4)    11.659 8.226     1.42
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 16UC4)   13.157 8.825     1.49
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1280x720, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 32FC4)   11.557 9.869     1.17
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 8UC1)    14.773 3.081     4.79
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 16UC1)   14.971 3.135     4.78
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 32FC1)   14.795 3.321     4.45
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 8UC3)    20.823 4.319     4.82
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 16UC3)   22.128 5.029     4.40
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 32FC3)   22.583 8.036     2.81
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 8UC4)    20.141 5.018     4.01
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 16UC4)   23.505 6.132     3.83
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_CONSTANT, 32FC4)   20.226 10.050    2.01
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 8UC1)   18.904 15.189    1.24
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 16UC1)  22.749 12.979    1.75
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 32FC1)  19.685 12.981    1.52
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 8UC3)   29.636 19.974    1.48
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 16UC3)  36.266 19.563    1.85
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 32FC3)  30.124 19.434    1.55
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 8UC4)   34.290 21.998    1.56
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 16UC4)  41.765 21.705    1.92
WarpPerspective::TestWarpPerspective::(1920x1080, INTER_LINEAR, BORDER_REPLICATE, 32FC4)  27.767 22.838    1.22
```

### Pull Request Readiness Checklist

See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request

- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
      Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
2024-10-15 11:13:41 +03:00
Suleyman TURKMEN
8e5dbc03fe
Merge pull request #26298 from sturkmen72:avif
Proposed solution for the issue 26297 #26298

closes #26297

### Pull Request Readiness Checklist

See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request

- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
      Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
2024-10-14 11:23:02 +03:00
Alexander Smorkalov
3c627b0a97
Merge pull request #26268 from mshabunin:cpp-array-test
C-API cleanup: rework ArrayTest to use new arrays only
2024-10-14 11:14:10 +03:00
Alexander Smorkalov
1909ac8650
Merge pull request #26212 from jamacias:feature/TickMeter-lasttime
Enhance cv::TickMeter to be able to get the last elapsed time
2024-10-14 07:56:24 +03:00
Letu Ren
45b9398d68 Use generic SIMD in warpAffineBlocklineNN 2024-10-14 01:28:41 +08:00