HAL added for Otsu threshold #25509fixes#25393
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
It is said "see above" because calcBackProject is listed under calcHist function in source file, while it is listed before due to the lexicographic ordering.
imgproc: refactor EMD to reduce C-API usage #25469
- added more tests for EMD
- refactored to remove CvArr
- used BufferArea for memory allocations
- renamed functions and variables and formatted the code
- kept legacy functions intact in separate header
imgproc: fix unaligned memory access in filters and Gaussian blur #25364
* filter/SIMD: removed parts which casted 8u pointers to int causing unaligned memory access on RISC-V platform.
* GaussianBlur/fixed_point: replaced casts from s16 to u32 with union operations
Performance comparison:
- [x] check performance on x86_64 - (4 threads, `-DCPU_BASELINE=AVX2`, GCC 11.4, Ubuntu 22) - [report_imgproc_x86_64.ods](https://github.com/opencv/opencv/files/14904702/report_x86_64.ods)
- [x] check performance on AArch64 - (4 cores of RK3588, GCC 11.4 aarch64, Raspbian) - [report_imgproc_aarch64.ods](https://github.com/opencv/opencv/files/14908437/report_aarch64.ods)
Note: for some reason my performance results are quite unstable, unaffected functions show speedups and slowdowns in many cases. Filter2D and GaussianBlur seem to be OK.
Slightly related PR: https://github.com/opencv/ci-gha-workflow/pull/165
Reworked findContours to reduce C-API usage #25146
What is done:
* rewritten `findContours` and `icvApproximateChainTC89` using C++ data structures
* extracted LINK_RUNS mode to separate new public functions - `findContoursLinkRuns` (it uses completely different algorithm)
* ~added new public `cv::approximateChainTC89`~ - **❌ decided to hide it**
* enabled chain code output (method = 0, no public enum value for this in C++ yet)
* kept old function as `findContours_old` (exported, but not exposed to user)
* added more tests for findContours (`test_contours_new.cpp`), some tests compare results of old function with new one. Following tests have been added:
* contours of random rectangle
* contours of many small (1-2px) blobs
* contours of random noise
* backport of old accuracy test
* separate test for LINK RUNS variant
What is left to be done (can be done now or later):
* improve tests:
* some tests have limited verification (e.g. only verify contour sizes)
* perhaps reference data can be collected and stored
* maybe more test variants can be added (?)
* add enum value for chain code output and a method of returning starting points (e.g. first 8 elements of returned `vector<uchar>` can represent 2 int point coordinates)
* add documentation for new functions - **✔️ DONE**
* check and improve performance (my experiment showed 0.7x-1.1x some time ago)
* remove old functions completely (?)
* change contour return order (BFS) or allow to select it (?)
* return result tree as-is (?) (new data structures should be exposed, bindings should adapt)
Documentation transition to fresh Doxygen #25042
* current Doxygen version is 1.10, but we will use 1.9.8 for now due to issue with snippets (https://github.com/doxygen/doxygen/pull/10584)
* Doxyfile adapted to new version
* MathJax updated to 3.x
* `@relates` instructions removed temporarily due to issue in Doxygen (to avoid warnings)
* refactored matx.hpp - extracted matx.inl.hpp
* opencv_contrib - https://github.com/opencv/opencv_contrib/pull/3638
First proposal of cv::remap with relative displacement field (#24603) #24621
Implements #24603
Currently, `remap()` is applied as `dst(x, y) <- src(mapX(x, y), mapY(x, y))` It means that the maps must be filled with absolute coordinates.
However, if one wants to remap something according to a displacement field ("warp"), the operation should be `dst(x, y) <- src(x+displacementX(x, y), y+displacementY(x, y))`
It is trivial to build a mapping from a displacement field, but it is an undesirable overhead for CPU and memory.
This PR implements the feature as an experimental option, through the optional flag WARP_RELATIVE_MAP than can be ORed to the interpolation mode.
Since the xy maps might be const, there is no attempt to add the coordinate offset to those maps, and everything is postponed on-the-fly to the very last coordinate computation before fetching `src`. Interestingly, this let `cv::convertMaps()` unchanged since the fractional part of interpolation does not care of the integer coordinate offset.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [X] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [X] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [X] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [X] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [X] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Fix race condition in color_lab.cpp initLabTabs(). #24581
There is a race condition between when the static bool is initialized (which is thread safe) and its value check. This PR changes the static bool to a static lambda call to make it thread safe. The static_cast<void> in the end is to prevent unused variables warnings.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
Fix out of image corners in cv::cornerSubPix #24527
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Handle huge images in IPP distanceTransform #24535
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
* Do not use IPP for huge Mat (reproduced with https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/23895#issuecomment-1708132367 on `DIST_MASK_5`)
I have observed two types of errors on the reproducer from the issue:
1. When `temp` is not allocated:
```
Thread 1 "app" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00007ffff65dc755 in icv_l9_ownDistanceTransform_5x5_8u32f_C1R_21B_g9e9 () from /home/dkurtaev/opencv_install/bin/../lib/libopencv_imgproc.so.408
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007ffff65dc755 in icv_l9_ownDistanceTransform_5x5_8u32f_C1R_21B_g9e9 () from /home/dkurtaev/opencv_install/bin/../lib/libopencv_imgproc.so.408
#1 0x00007ffff659e8df in icv_l9_ippiDistanceTransform_5x5_8u32f_C1R () from /home/dkurtaev/opencv_install/bin/../lib/libopencv_imgproc.so.408
#2 0x00007ffff5c390f0 in cv::distanceTransform (_src=..., _dst=..., _labels=..., distType=2, maskSize=5, labelType=1) at /home/dkurtaev/opencv/modules/imgproc/src/distransform.cpp:854
#3 0x00007ffff5c396ef in cv::distanceTransform (_src=..., _dst=..., distanceType=2, maskSize=5, dstType=5) at /home/dkurtaev/opencv/modules/imgproc/src/distransform.cpp:903
#4 0x000055555555669e in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffdef8) at /home/dkurtaev/main.cpp:18
```
2. When we keep `temp` allocated every time:
```
OpenCV(4.8.0-dev) Error: Assertion failed (udata < (uchar*)ptr && ((uchar*)ptr - udata) <= (ptrdiff_t)(sizeof(void*)+64)) in fastFree, file /home/dkurtaev/opencv/modules/core/src/alloc.cpp, line 191
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'cv::Exception'
what(): OpenCV(4.8.0-dev) /home/dkurtaev/opencv/modules/core/src/alloc.cpp:191: error: (-215:Assertion failed) udata < (uchar*)ptr && ((uchar*)ptr - udata) <= (ptrdiff_t)(sizeof(void*)+64) in function 'fastFree'
```
* Try enable IPP for 3x3 (see https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/15904)
* Reduce memory footprint with IPP
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Speed up line merging in INTER_AREA #24412
This provides a 10 to 20% speed-up.
Related perf test fix: https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/24417
This is a split of https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/23525 that will be updated to only deal with column merging.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Implement color conversion from RGB to YUV422 family #24333
Related PR for extra: https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1104
Hi,
This patch provides CPU and OpenCL implementations of color conversions from RGB/BGR to YUV422 family (such as UYVY and YUY2).
These features would come in useful for enabling standard RGB images to be supplied as input to algorithms or networks that make use of images in YUV422 format directly (for example, on resource constrained devices working with camera images captured in YUV422).
The code, tests and perf tests are all written following the existing pattern. There is also an example `bin/example_cpp_cvtColor_RGB2YUV422` that loads an image from disk, converts it from BGR to UYVY and then back to BGR, and displays the result as a visual check that the conversion works.
The OpenCL performance for the forward conversion implemented here is the same as the existing backward conversion on my hardware. The CPU implementation, unfortunately, isn't very optimized as I am not yet familiar with the SIMD code.
Please let me know if I need to fix something or can make other modifications.
Thanks!
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Rewrite Universal Intrinsic code: float related part #24325
The goal of this series of PRs is to modify the SIMD code blocks guarded by CV_SIMD macro: rewrite them by using the new Universal Intrinsic API.
The series of PRs is listed below:
#23885 First patch, an example
#23980 Core module
#24058 ImgProc module, part 1
#24132 ImgProc module, part 2
#24166 ImgProc module, part 3
#24301 Features2d and calib3d module
#24324 Gapi module
This patch (hopefully) is the last one in the series.
This patch mainly involves 3 parts
1. Add some modifications related to float (CV_SIMD_64F)
2. Use `#if (CV_SIMD || CV_SIMD_SCALABLE)` instead of `#if CV_SIMD || CV_SIMD_SCALABLE`,
then we can get the `CV_SIMD` module that is not enabled for `CV_SIMD_SCALABLE` by looking for `if CV_SIMD`
3. Summary of `CV_SIMD` blocks that remains unmodified: Updated comments
- Some blocks will cause test fail when enable for RVV, marked as `TODO: enable for CV_SIMD_SCALABLE, ....`
- Some blocks can not be rewrited directly. (Not commented in the source code, just listed here)
- ./modules/core/src/mathfuncs_core.simd.hpp (Vector type wrapped in class/struct)
- ./modules/imgproc/src/color_lab.cpp (Array of vector type)
- ./modules/imgproc/src/color_rgb.simd.hpp (Array of vector type)
- ./modules/imgproc/src/sumpixels.simd.hpp (fixed length algorithm, strongly ralated with `CV_SIMD_WIDTH`)
These algorithms will need to be redesigned to accommodate scalable backends.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [ ] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [ ] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Rewrite Universal Intrinsic code: ImgProc (CV_SIMD_WIDTH related Part) #24166
Related PR: #24058, #24132. The goal of this series of PRs is to modify the SIMD code blocks in the opencv/modules/imgproc folder by using the new Universal Intrinsic API.
The modification of this PR mainly focuses on the code that uses the `CV_SIMD_WIDTH` macro. This macro is sometimes used for loop tail processing, such as `box_filter.simd.hpp` and `morph.simd.hpp`.
```cpp
#if CV_SIMD
int i = 0;
for (i < n - v_uint16::nlanes; i += v_uint16::nlanes) {
// some universal intrinsic code
// e.g. v_uint16...
}
#if CV_SIMD_WIDTH > 16
for (i < n - v_uint16x8::nlanes; i += v_uint16x8::nlanes) {
// handle loop tail by 128 bit SIMD
// e.g. v_uint16x8
}
#endif //CV_SIMD_WIDTH
#endif// CV_SIMD
```
The main contradiction is that the variable-length Universal Intrinsic backend cannot use 128bit fixed-length data structures. Therefore, this PR uses the scalar loop to handle the loop tail.
This PR is marked as draft because the modification of the `box_filter.simd.hpp` file caused a compilation error. The cause of the error is initially believed to be due to an internal error in the GCC compiler.
```bash
box_filter.simd.hpp:1162:5: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
1162 | }
| ^
0xe03883 crash_signal
/wafer/share/gcc/gcc/toplev.cc:314
0x7ff261c4251f ???
./signal/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/libc_sigaction.c:0
0x6bde48 hash_set<rtl_ssa::set_info*, false, default_hash_traits<rtl_ssa::set_info*> >::iterator::operator*()
/wafer/share/gcc/gcc/hash-set.h:125
0x6bde48 extract_single_source
/wafer/share/gcc/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc:1184
0x6bde48 extract_single_source
/wafer/share/gcc/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc:1174
0x119ad9e pass_vsetvl::propagate_avl() const
/wafer/share/gcc/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc:4087
0x119ceaf pass_vsetvl::execute(function*)
/wafer/share/gcc/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc:4344
0x119ceaf pass_vsetvl::execute(function*)
/wafer/share/gcc/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc:4325
Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source (by using -freport-bug).
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
```
This PR can be compiled with Clang 16, and `opencv_test_imgproc` is passed on QEMU.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [ ] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [ ] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Rewrite Universal Intrinsic code by using new API: ImgProc module Part 2 #24132
The goal of this series of PRs is to modify the SIMD code blocks guarded by CV_SIMD macro in the opencv/modules/imgproc folder: rewrite them by using the new Universal Intrinsic API.
This is the second part of the modification to the Imgproc module ( Part 1: #24058 ), And I tested this patch on RVV (QEMU) and AVX devices, `opencv_test_imgproc` is passed.
The patch is partially auto-generated by using the [rewriter](https://github.com/hanliutong/rewriter).
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [ ] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [ ] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
