Suppress build warnings for GCC14 #25686Close#25674
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Port G-API ONNXRT backend into V2 API #25662
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [ ] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [ ] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
G-API OV backend requires cv::MediaFrame #24938
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
**Background_subtraction demo G-API issue. Update:**
Porting to API20 resulted in an error (both for CPU and NPU):
```
[ERROR] OpenCV(4.9.0-dev) /home/runner/work/open_model_zoo/open_model_zoo/cache/opencv/modules/gapi/src/backends/ov/govbackend.cpp:813: error: (-215: assertion not done ) cv::util::holds_alternative<cv::GMatDesc>(input_meta) in function 'cfgPreProcessing'
```
Adding cv::MediaFrame support to govbackend resulted in the following (tested with CPU):
<img width="941" alt="image" src="https://github.com/opencv/opencv/assets/52502732/3a003d61-bda7-4b1e-9117-3410cda1ba32">
### TODO
- [ ] **As part of the review process [this comment](https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/24938#discussion_r1487694043) was addressed which make it impossible to run the demo. I will bring those changes back in a separate PR [support `PartialShape`]**
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
G-API: A quick value-initialization support GMat #25055
This PR enables `GMat` objects to be value-initialized in the same way as it was done for `GScalar`s (and, possibly, other types).
- Added some helper methods in backends to distinguish if a certain G-type value initialization is supported or not;
- Added tests, including negative.
Where it is needed:
- Further extension of the OVCV backend (#24379 - will be refreshed soon);
- Further experiments with DNN module;
- Further experiments with "G-API behind UMat" sort of aggregation.
In the current form, PR can be reviewed & merged (@TolyaTalamanov please have a look)
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Documentation transition to fresh Doxygen #25042
* current Doxygen version is 1.10, but we will use 1.9.8 for now due to issue with snippets (https://github.com/doxygen/doxygen/pull/10584)
* Doxyfile adapted to new version
* MathJax updated to 3.x
* `@relates` instructions removed temporarily due to issue in Doxygen (to avoid warnings)
* refactored matx.hpp - extracted matx.inl.hpp
* opencv_contrib - https://github.com/opencv/opencv_contrib/pull/3638
G-API: Make test execution lighter (first attempt) #25060
### Background
G-API tests look running longer than tests for the rest of modules (e.g., 5m), and the analysis show that there's several outliers in G-API test suite which take a lot of time but don't improve the testing quality much:
In this PR I will cut the execution time to something reasonable.
### Contents
- Marked some outliers as `verylong`:
- OneVPL barrier test - pure brute force
- Stateful test in stream - in fact BG Sub accuracy test clone
- Restructured parameters instantiation in Streaming tests to generate less test configurations (54 -> 36)
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
G-API: Lower supported IE backend version #25054
Related to https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/25053
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
G-API: Implement concurrent executor #24845
## Overview
This PR introduces the new G-API executor called `GThreadedExecutor` which can be selected when the `GComputation` is compiled in `serial` mode (a.k.a `GComputation::compile(...)`)
### ThreadPool
`cv::gapi::own::ThreadPool` has been introduced in order to abstract usage of threads in `GThreadedExecutor`.
`ThreadPool` is implemented by using `own::concurrent_bounded_queue`
`ThreadPool` has only as single method `schedule` that will push task into the queue for the further execution.
The **important** notice is that if `Task` executed in `ThreadPool` throws exception - this is `UB`.
### GThreadedExecutor
The `GThreadedExecutor` is mostly copy-paste of `GExecutor`, should we extend `GExecutor` instead?
#### Implementation details
1. Build the dependency graph for `Island` nodes.
2. Store the tasks that don't have dependencies into separate `vector` in order to run them first.
3. at the `GThreadedExecutor::run()` schedule the tasks that don't have dependencies that will schedule their dependents and wait for the completion.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [ ] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [ ] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
G-API: Support CoreML Execution Providers for ONNXRT Backend #24068
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [ ] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [ ] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
G-API: Get input model layout from the IR if possible in OV 2.0 backend #24658
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
G-API: Implement inference only mode for OV backend #24584
### Changes overview
Introduced `cv::gapi::wip::ov::benchmark_mode{}` compile argument which if enabled force `OpenVINO` backend to run only inference without populating input and copying back output tensors.
This mode is only relevant for measuring the performance of pure inference without data transfers. Similar approach is using on OpenVINO side in `benchmark_app`: https://github.com/openvinotoolkit/openvino/blob/master/samples/cpp/benchmark_app/benchmark_app.hpp#L134-L139
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
G-API: Advanced device selection for ONNX DirectML Execution Provider #24060
### Overview
Extend `cv::gapi::onnx::ep::DirectML` to accept `adapter name` as `ctor` parameter in order to select execution device by `name`.
E.g:
```
pp.cfgAddExecutionProvider(cv::gapi::onnx::ep::DirectML("Intel Graphics"));
```
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [ ] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [ ] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
G-API: Introduce a Queue Source #24178
- Added a new IStreamSource class: in fact, a wrapper over a concurrent queue;
- Added minimal example on how it can be used;
- Extended IStreamSource with optional "halt" interface to break the blocking calls in the emitter threads when required to stop.
- Introduced a QueueInput class which allows to pass the whole graph's input vector at once. In fact it is a thin wrapper atop of individual Queue Sources.
There is a hidden trap found with our type system as described in https://github.com/orgs/g-api-org/discussions/2
While it works even in this form, it should be addressed somewhere in the 5.0 timeframe.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
G-API: Support CUDA & TensoRT Execution Providers for ONNXRT Backend #24059
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [ ] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [ ] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
G-API: Support DirectML Execution Provider for ONNXRT Backend #24045
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [ ] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [ ] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
G-API: Support OpenVINO Execution Provider for ONNXRT Backend #24024
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [ ] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [ ] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
G-API: Fix async inference for OpenVINO backend #23884
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [ ] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [ ] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
G-API: Fix incorrect OpaqueKind for Kernel outputs #23843
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
#### Overview
The PR is going to fix several problems:
1. Major: `GKernel` doesn't hold `kind` for its outputs. Since `GModelBuilder` traverse graph from outputs to inputs once it reaches any output of the operation it will use its `kind` to create `Data` meta for all operation outputs. Since it essential for `python` to know `GTypeInfo` (which is `shape` and `kind`) it will be confused.
Consider this operation:
```
@cv.gapi.op('custom.square_mean', in_types=[cv.GArray.Int], out_types=[cv.GOpaque.Float, cv.GArray.Int])
class GSquareMean:
@staticmethod
def outMeta(desc):
return cv.empty_gopaque_desc(), cv.empty_array_desc()
```
Even though `GOpaque` is `Float`, corresponding metadata might have `Int` kind because it might be taken from `cv.GArray.Int`
so it will be a problem if one of the outputs of these operation is graph output because python will cast it to the wrong type based on `Data` meta.
2. Minor: Some of the OpenVINO `IR`'s doesn't any layout information for input. It's usually true only for `IRv10` but since `OpenVINO 2.0` need this information to correctly configure resize we need to put default layout if there no such assigned in `ov::Model`.
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [ ] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [ ] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
