Added xxxApprox overloads for YUV color conversions in HAL and AlgorithmHint to cvtColor #25932
The xxxApprox to implement HAL functions with less bits for arithmetic of FP.
The hint was introduced in #25792 and #25911
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Improved classification sample #25519#25006#25314
This pull requests replaces the caffe model for classification with onnx versions. It also adds resnet in model.yml.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Removed obsolete python samples #25268
Clean Samples #25006
This PR removes 36 obsolete python samples from the project, as part of an effort to keep the codebase clean and focused on current best practices. Some of these samples will be updated with latest algorithms or will be combined with other existing samples.
Removed Samples:
> browse.py
camshift.py
coherence.py
color_histogram.py
contours.py
deconvolution.py
dft.py
dis_opt_flow.py
distrans.py
edge.py
feature_homography.py
find_obj.py
fitline.py
gabor_threads.py
hist.py
houghcircles.py
houghlines.py
inpaint.py
kalman.py
kmeans.py
laplace.py
lk_homography.py
lk_track.py
logpolar.py
mosse.py
mser.py
opt_flow.py
plane_ar.py
squares.py
stitching.py
text_skewness_correction.py
texture_flow.py
turing.py
video_threaded.py
video_v4l2.py
watershed.py
These changes aim to improve the repository's clarity and usability by removing examples that are no longer relevant or have been superseded by more up-to-date techniques.
Add a check for src == dst in ocl warpTransform #25898
As mentioned in #25853, when doing WarpAffine with Mat and UMat respectively, if you force the use of the in-place operation (so that src and dst are passed the same variables), Mat produces the correct results, but UMat produces unexpected results.
Obviously in-place operations are not possible with this transformation. When Mat performs the operation, if dst and src are the same variable, the function inherently makes a copy of src without telling the user.
74b50c7af0/modules/imgproc/src/imgwarp.cpp (L2831-L2834)
So I did the same check in UMat, but I'm not sure if it's appropriate, should we just do a copy operation without telling the user (even if the user thinks he's doing an in-place operation), or should we throw an exception to indicate that we shouldn't pass in two same variables here?
The possible reason for this problem is that there is a create function here, so it gives the developer the false impression that this create function has allocated new memory for dst, however it does not.
74b50c7af0/modules/imgproc/src/imgwarp.cpp (L2607-L2609)
Because by the time the check is done here, the function has returned back.
74b50c7af0/modules/core/src/umatrix.cpp (L668-L675)
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Added flag to GaussianBlur for faster but not bit-exact implementation #25792
Rationale:
Current implementation of GaussianBlur is almost always bit-exact. It helps to get predictable results according platforms, but prohibits most of approximations and optimization tricks.
The patch converts `borderType` parameter to more generic `flags` and introduces `GAUSS_ALLOW_APPROXIMATIONS` flag to allow not bit-exact implementation. With the flag IPP and generic HAL implementation are called first. The flag naming and location is a subject for discussion.
Replaces https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/22073
Possibly related issue: https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/24135
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Move API focused C++ samples to snippets #25252
Clean Samples #25006
This PR removes 39 outdated C++ samples from the project, as part of an effort to keep the codebase clean and focused on current best practices.
Add a new function that approximates the polygon bounding a convex hull with a certain number of sides #25607
merge PR with <https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1179>
This PR is based on the paper [View Frustum Optimization To Maximize Object’s Image Area](https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=1fbd43f3827fffeb76641a9c5ab5b625eb5a75ba).
# Problem
I needed to reduce the number of vertices of the convex hull so that the additional area was minimal, andall vertices of the original contour enter the new contour.
![image](https://github.com/Fest1veNapkin/opencv/assets/98156294/efac35f6-b8f0-46ec-91e4-60800432620c)
![image](https://github.com/Fest1veNapkin/opencv/assets/98156294/2292d9d7-1c10-49c9-8489-23221b4b28f7)
# Description
Initially in the contour of n vertices, at each stage we consider the intersection points of the lines formed by each adjacent edges. Each of these intersection points will form a triangle with vertices through which lines pass. Let's choose a triangle with the minimum area and merge the two vertices at the intersection point. We continue until there are more vertices than the specified number of sides of the approximated polygon.
![image](https://github.com/Fest1veNapkin/opencv/assets/98156294/b87b21c4-112e-450d-a776-2a120048ca30)
# Complexity:
Using a std::priority_queue or std::set time complexity is **(O(n\*ln(n))**, memory **O(n)**,
n - number of vertices in convex hull.
count of sides - the number of points by which we must reduce.
![image](https://github.com/Fest1veNapkin/opencv/assets/98156294/31ad5562-a67d-4e3c-bdc2-29f8b52caf88)
## Comment
If epsilon_percentage more 0, algorithm can return more values than _side_.
Algorithm returns OutputArray. If OutputArray.type() equals 0, algorithm returns values with InputArray.type().
New test uses image which are not in opencv_extra, needs to be added.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [ ] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [ ] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
imgproc: remove C-API usage from tests #25842
Final cleanup will be done in 5.x after regular merge.
Some tests have been reworked, some required only slight modifications.
Accuracy tests for equalizeHist() added #25759
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Relates to #24603
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [X] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [X] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [X] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [X] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Reverted contour approximation behavior #25680
Related issue #25663 - revert new function behavior despite it returning different result than the old one (reverts PR #25672).
Also added Coverity issue fix.
YUV codes for cvtColor: descriptions added #25616
This PR contains descriptions for various RGB <-> YUV color conversion codes as well as detailed comments in the source code.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Tests for cvSmooth -> tests for boxFilter #25634fixes#25448
### Motivation
The obsolete function `cvSmooth` has two modes in which it calls `cv::boxFilter()` inside with and without normalization.
This function is covered by tests exactly for that modes.
This means that by replacing `cvSmooth` call by `cv::boxFilter()` we will leave the coverage untouched (but more obvious) and remove that obsolete function from tests.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
imgproc: C-API cleanup, drawContours refactor #25564
Changes:
* moved several macros from types_c.h to cvdef.h (assuming we will continue using them)
* removed some cases of C-API usage in _imgproc_ module (`CV_TERMCRIT_*` and `CV_CMP_*`)
* refactored `drawContours` to use C++ API instead of calling `cvDrawContours` + test for filled contours with holes (case with non-filled contours is simpler and is covered in some other tests)
#### Note:
There is one case where old drawContours behavior doesn't match the new one - when `contourIdx == -1` (means "draw all contours") and `maxLevel == 0` (means draw only selected contours, but not what is inside).
From the docs:
> **contourIdx** Parameter indicating a contour to draw. If it is negative, all the contours are drawn.
> **maxLevel** Maximal level for drawn contours. If it is 0, only the specified contour is drawn. If it is 1, the function draws the contour(s) and all the nested contours. If it is 2, the function draws the contours, all the nested contours, all the nested-to-nested contours, and so on. This parameter is only taken into account when there is hierarchy available.
Old behavior - only one first contour is drawn:
![actual_screenshot_08 05 2024](https://github.com/opencv/opencv/assets/3304494/d0ae1d64-ddad-46bb-8acc-6f696874f71b)
a
New behavior (also expected by the test) - all contours are drawn:
![expected_screenshot_08 05 2024](https://github.com/opencv/opencv/assets/3304494/57ccd980-9dde-4006-90ee-19d6ce76912a)
Merge pull request #25565 from savuor/rv/hal_eq_hist
HAL for equalizeHist() added #25565fixes#25530
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
HAL added for Otsu threshold #25509fixes#25393
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
It is said "see above" because calcBackProject is listed under calcHist function in source file, while it is listed before due to the lexicographic ordering.
imgproc: refactor EMD to reduce C-API usage #25469
- added more tests for EMD
- refactored to remove CvArr
- used BufferArea for memory allocations
- renamed functions and variables and formatted the code
- kept legacy functions intact in separate header