FreeBSD does not have the /proc file system. FreeBSD was added to the code path
for aarch64 before the use of the /proc file system with f7b4b750d8
but then /proc usage was added not long after with b3269b08a1
Fix to convert float32 to int32/uint32 with rounding to nearest (ties to even). #24271
Fix https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/24163
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
(carotene is BSD)
Add experimental support for Apple VisionOS platform #24136
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
This is dependent on cmake support for VisionOs which is currently in progress.
Creating PR now to test that there are no regressions in iOS and macOS builds
I do not have more info on the platform as it is internal.
Without this fix, the error is:
core/src/arithm.simd.hpp:868:1: error: too few arguments provided to function-like macro invocation
868 | DEFINE_SIMD_ALL(cmp)
| ^
./third_party/OpenCV/public/modules/./core/src/arithm.simd.hpp:93:5: note: expanded from macro 'DEFINE_SIMD_ALL'
93 | DEFINE_SIMD_NSAT(fun, __VA_ARGS__)
| ^
./third_party/OpenCV/public/modules/./core/src/arithm.simd.hpp:89:5: note: expanded from macro 'DEFINE_SIMD_NSAT'
89 | DEFINE_SIMD_F64(fun, __VA_ARGS__)
| ^
./third_party/OpenCV/public/modules/./core/src/arithm.simd.hpp:77:9: note: expanded from macro 'DEFINE_SIMD_F64'
77 | DEFINE_NOSIMD(__CV_CAT(fun, 64f), double, __VA_ARGS__)
| ^
./third_party/OpenCV/public/modules/./core/src/arithm.simd.hpp:47:56: note: expanded from macro 'DEFINE_NOSIMD'
47 | DEFINE_NOSIMD_FUN(fun_name, c_type, __VA_ARGS__)
| ^
./third_party/OpenCV/public/modules/./core/src/arithm.simd.hpp:860:9: note: macro 'DEFINE_NOSIMD_FUN' defined here
860 | #define DEFINE_NOSIMD_FUN(fun, _T1, _Tvec, ...) \
This patch change lsx to baseline feature, and lasx to dispatch
feature. Additionally, the runtime detection methods for lasx and
lsx have been modified.
* add Winograd FP16 implementation
* fixed dispatching of FP16 code paths in dnn; use dynamic dispatcher only when NEON_FP16 is enabled in the build and the feature is present in the host CPU at runtime
* fixed some warnings
* hopefully fixed winograd on x64 (and maybe other platforms)
---------
Co-authored-by: Vadim Pisarevsky <vadim.pisarevsky@gmail.com>
Get the SSE2 condition match the emmintrin.h inclusion condition. #24495
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Backport to 4.x: patchNaNs() SIMD acceleration #24480
backport from #23098
connected PR in extra: [#1118@extra](https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1118)
### This PR contains:
* new SIMD code for `patchNaNs()`
* CPU perf test
<details>
<summary>Performance comparison</summary>
Geometric mean (ms)
|Name of Test|noopt|sse2|avx2|sse2 vs noopt (x-factor)|avx2 vs noopt (x-factor)|
|---|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|
|PatchNaNs::OCL_PatchNaNsFixture::(640x480, 32FC1)|0.019|0.017|0.018|1.11|1.07|
|PatchNaNs::OCL_PatchNaNsFixture::(640x480, 32FC4)|0.037|0.037|0.033|1.00|1.10|
|PatchNaNs::OCL_PatchNaNsFixture::(1280x720, 32FC1)|0.032|0.032|0.033|0.99|0.98|
|PatchNaNs::OCL_PatchNaNsFixture::(1280x720, 32FC4)|0.072|0.072|0.070|1.00|1.03|
|PatchNaNs::OCL_PatchNaNsFixture::(1920x1080, 32FC1)|0.051|0.051|0.050|1.00|1.01|
|PatchNaNs::OCL_PatchNaNsFixture::(1920x1080, 32FC4)|0.137|0.138|0.128|0.99|1.06|
|PatchNaNs::OCL_PatchNaNsFixture::(3840x2160, 32FC1)|0.137|0.128|0.129|1.07|1.06|
|PatchNaNs::OCL_PatchNaNsFixture::(3840x2160, 32FC4)|0.450|0.450|0.448|1.00|1.01|
|PatchNaNs::PatchNaNsFixture::(640x480, 32FC1)|0.149|0.029|0.020|5.13|7.44|
|PatchNaNs::PatchNaNsFixture::(640x480, 32FC2)|0.304|0.058|0.040|5.25|7.65|
|PatchNaNs::PatchNaNsFixture::(640x480, 32FC3)|0.448|0.086|0.059|5.22|7.55|
|PatchNaNs::PatchNaNsFixture::(640x480, 32FC4)|0.601|0.133|0.083|4.51|7.23|
|PatchNaNs::PatchNaNsFixture::(1280x720, 32FC1)|0.451|0.093|0.060|4.83|7.52|
|PatchNaNs::PatchNaNsFixture::(1280x720, 32FC2)|0.892|0.184|0.126|4.85|7.06|
|PatchNaNs::PatchNaNsFixture::(1280x720, 32FC3)|1.345|0.311|0.230|4.32|5.84|
|PatchNaNs::PatchNaNsFixture::(1280x720, 32FC4)|1.831|0.546|0.436|3.35|4.20|
|PatchNaNs::PatchNaNsFixture::(1920x1080, 32FC1)|1.017|0.250|0.160|4.06|6.35|
|PatchNaNs::PatchNaNsFixture::(1920x1080, 32FC2)|2.077|0.646|0.605|3.21|3.43|
|PatchNaNs::PatchNaNsFixture::(1920x1080, 32FC3)|3.134|1.053|0.961|2.97|3.26|
|PatchNaNs::PatchNaNsFixture::(1920x1080, 32FC4)|4.222|1.436|1.288|2.94|3.28|
|PatchNaNs::PatchNaNsFixture::(3840x2160, 32FC1)|4.225|1.401|1.277|3.01|3.31|
|PatchNaNs::PatchNaNsFixture::(3840x2160, 32FC2)|8.310|2.953|2.635|2.81|3.15|
|PatchNaNs::PatchNaNsFixture::(3840x2160, 32FC3)|12.396|4.455|4.252|2.78|2.92|
|PatchNaNs::PatchNaNsFixture::(3840x2160, 32FC4)|17.174|5.831|5.824|2.95|2.95|
</details>
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Refactor ObjectiveC Range class #24454
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
Fix for build issue in #24405
* Optimize some function with lasx.
Optimize some function with lasx. #23929
This patch optimizes some lasx functions and reduces the runtime of opencv_test_core from 662,238ms to 633603ms on the 3A5000 platform.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
* added more or less cross-platform (based on POSIX signal() semantics) method to detect various NEON extensions, such as FP16 SIMD arithmetics, BF16 SIMD arithmetics, SIMD dotprod etc. It could be propagated to other instruction sets if necessary.
* hopefully fixed compile errors
* continue to fix CI
* another attempt to fix build on Linux aarch64
* * reverted to the original method to detect special arm neon instructions without signal()
* renamed FP16_SIMD & BF16_SIMD to NEON_FP16 and NEON_BF16, respectively
* removed extra whitespaces
Add HAL implementation hooks to cv::flip() and cv::rotate() functions from core module #24233
Hello,
This change proposes the addition of HAL hooks for cv::flip() and cv::rotate() functions from OpenCV core module.
Flip and rotation are functions commonly available from 2D hardware accelerators. This is convenient provision to enable custom optimized implementation of image flip/rotation on systems embedding such accelerator.
Thank you
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Rewrite Universal Intrinsic code: float related part #24325
The goal of this series of PRs is to modify the SIMD code blocks guarded by CV_SIMD macro: rewrite them by using the new Universal Intrinsic API.
The series of PRs is listed below:
#23885 First patch, an example
#23980 Core module
#24058 ImgProc module, part 1
#24132 ImgProc module, part 2
#24166 ImgProc module, part 3
#24301 Features2d and calib3d module
#24324 Gapi module
This patch (hopefully) is the last one in the series.
This patch mainly involves 3 parts
1. Add some modifications related to float (CV_SIMD_64F)
2. Use `#if (CV_SIMD || CV_SIMD_SCALABLE)` instead of `#if CV_SIMD || CV_SIMD_SCALABLE`,
then we can get the `CV_SIMD` module that is not enabled for `CV_SIMD_SCALABLE` by looking for `if CV_SIMD`
3. Summary of `CV_SIMD` blocks that remains unmodified: Updated comments
- Some blocks will cause test fail when enable for RVV, marked as `TODO: enable for CV_SIMD_SCALABLE, ....`
- Some blocks can not be rewrited directly. (Not commented in the source code, just listed here)
- ./modules/core/src/mathfuncs_core.simd.hpp (Vector type wrapped in class/struct)
- ./modules/imgproc/src/color_lab.cpp (Array of vector type)
- ./modules/imgproc/src/color_rgb.simd.hpp (Array of vector type)
- ./modules/imgproc/src/sumpixels.simd.hpp (fixed length algorithm, strongly ralated with `CV_SIMD_WIDTH`)
These algorithms will need to be redesigned to accommodate scalable backends.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [ ] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [ ] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Fix tests writing to current work dir #24343
Several tests were writing files in the current work directory and did not clean up after test. Moved all temporary files to the `/tmp` dir and added a cleanup code.
Optimization for parallelization when large core number #24280
**Problem description：**
When the number of cores is large, OpenCV’s thread library may reduce performance when processing parallel jobs.
**The reason for this problem:**
When the number of cores (the thread pool initialized the threads, whose number is as same as the number of cores) is large, the main thread will spend too much time on waking up unnecessary threads.
When a parallel job needs to be executed, the main thread will wake up all threads in sequence, and then wait for the signal for the job completion after waking up all threads. When the number of threads is larger than the parallel number of a job slices, there will be a situation where the main thread wakes up the threads in sequence and the awakened threads have completed the job, but the main thread is still waking up the other threads. The threads woken up by the main thread after this have nothing to do, and the broadcasts made by the waking threads take a lot of time, which reduce the performance.
**Solution：**
Reduce the time for the process of main thread waking up the worker threads through the following two methods:
• The number of threads awakened by the main thread should be adjusted according to the parallel number of a job slices. If the number of threads is greater than the number of the parallel number of job slices, the total number of threads awakened should be reduced.
• In the process of waking up threads in sequence, if the main thread finds that all parallel job slices have been allocated, it will jump out of the loop in time and wait for the signal for the job completion.
**Performance Test:**
The tests were run in the manner described by https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/HowToUsePerfTests.
At core number = 160, There are big performance gain in some cases.
Take the following cases in the video module as examples:
OpticalFlowPyrLK_self::Path_Idx_Cn_NPoints_WSize_Deriv::("cv/optflow/frames/VGA_%02d.png", 2, 1, (9, 9), 11, true)
Performance improves 191%:0.185405ms ->0.0636496ms
perf::DenseOpticalFlow_VariationalRefinement::(320x240, 10, 10)
Performance improves 112%:23.88938ms -> 11.2562ms
Among all the modules, the performance improvement is greatest on module video, and there are also certain improvements on other modules.
At core number = 160, the times labeled below are the geometric mean of the average time of all cases for one module. The optimization is available on each module.
overall | time(ms) | | | | | | |
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | --
module name | gapi | dnn | features2d | objdetect | core | imgproc | stitching | video
original | 0.185 | 1.586 | 9.998 | 11.846 | 0.205 | 0.215 | 164.409 | 0.803
optimized | 0.174 | 1.353 | 9.535 | 11.105 | 0.199 | 0.185 | 153.972 | 0.489
Performance improves | 6% | 17% | 5% | 7% | 3% | 16% | 7% | 64%
Meanwhile, It is found that adjusting the order of test cases will have an impact on some test cases. For example, we used option --gtest-shuffle to run opencv_perf_gapi, the performance of TestPerformance::CmpWithScalarPerfTestFluid/CmpWithScalarPerfTest::(compare_f, CMP_GE, 1920x1080, 32FC1, { gapi.kernel_package }) case had 30% changes compared to the case without shuffle. I would like to ask if you have also encountered such a situation and could you share your experience?
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Python: support tuple src for cv::add()/subtract()/... #24074
fix https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/24057
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ x The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Rewrite Universal Intrinsic code by using new API: ImgProc module Part 2 #24132
The goal of this series of PRs is to modify the SIMD code blocks guarded by CV_SIMD macro in the opencv/modules/imgproc folder: rewrite them by using the new Universal Intrinsic API.
This is the second part of the modification to the Imgproc module ( Part 1: #24058 ), And I tested this patch on RVV (QEMU) and AVX devices, `opencv_test_imgproc` is passed.
The patch is partially auto-generated by using the [rewriter](https://github.com/hanliutong/rewriter).
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [ ] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [ ] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Skip test on SkipTestException at fixture's constructor (version 2) #24250
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
Another version of https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/24186 (reverted by https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/24223). Current implementation cannot handle skip exception at `static void SetUpTestCase` but works on `virtual void SetUp`.
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Fix undefined behavior arithmetic in copyMakeBorder and adjustROI. #24260
This is due to the undefined: negative int multiplied by size_t pointer increment.
To test, compile with:
```
mkdir build
cd build
cmake ../ -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_INIT="-fsanitize=undefined" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_INIT="-fsanitize=undefined" -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="/usr/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="/usr/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS="-fsanitize=undefined -lubsan"
```
And run:
```
make -j opencv_test_core && ./bin/opencv_test_core --gtest_filter=*UndefinedBehavior*
```
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
