Fix mismatch and simplify code in ChessBoardDetector::findQuadNeighbors #24667
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
Сode doesn't match comment.
If we want check `1:4` edges ratio and `edge_len` is squared edge length, then we should check
```
ediff > 15*edge_len
```
with constant `15`, not `32`, because
```
ediff > 15*edge_len2 <=> edge_len1 - edge_len2 > 15*edge_len2 <=> edge_len1 > 16*edge_len2 <=> 1:4 edges ratio
```
But for me it's better and simpler to directly check `edge_len1 > 16*edge_len2`
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Currently, if `PNG_FOUND`, cmake scripts will check include and parse
header while we can use `PNG_VERSION_STRING` conveniently. If
`BUILD_PNG`, parse version from `PNG_LIBPNG_VER_STRING` directly is more
convenient than parsing major, minor and patch and concatenate them.
The comment of png.h also supports this.
```
/* These should match the first 3 components of PNG_LIBPNG_VER_STRING: */
```
https://github.com/glennrp/libpng/blob/libpng16/png.h#L287
This patch also modifies `ocv_parse_header_version` macro to receive
another parameter to make it more general.
The reason why changing `PNG_VERSION` to `PNG_VERSION_STRING` is to be
consistent with cmake's FindPNG.
This patch removes `HAVE_LIBPNG_PNG_H` variable because `PNG_INCLUDE_DIR`
is where to find png.h, etc according to
https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/module/FindPNG.html.
This patch also removes `PNG_PNG_INCLUDE_DIR` variable which is an
advanced variable used in cmake's FindPNG and is not used in opencv.
Fixes#22747. Support [crop] configuration for DarkNet #24384
Request for comments. This is my first PR.
**Merge with extra**: https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1112
resolves https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/22747
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Try to enable Winograd by default in FP32 mode and disable it by default in FP16 mode #24709
Hopefully, it will resolve regressions since 4.8.1 (see also https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/24587)
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [ ] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [ ] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
dnn: add attention layer #24476Resolves#24609
Merge with: https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1128.
Attention operator spec from onnxruntime: https://github.com/microsoft/onnxruntime/blob/v1.16.1/docs/ContribOperators.md#com.microsoft.Attention.
TODO:
- [x] benchmark (before this PR vs. with this PR vs. ORT).
- [x] Layer fusion: Take care Slice with end=INT64_MAX.
- [x] Layer fusion: match more potential attention (VIT) patterns.
- [x] Single-head attention is supported.
- [x] Test AttentionSubgraph fusion.
- [x] Add acc tests for VIT_B_32 and VitTrack
- [x] Add perf tests for VIT_B_32 and VitTrack
## Benchmarks
Platform: Macbook Air M1.
### Attention Subgraph
Input scale: [1, 197, 768].
| | mean (ms) | median (ms) | min (ms) |
| ---------------------- | --------- | ----------- | -------- |
| w/ Attention (this PR) | 3.75 | 3.68 | 3.22 |
| w/o Attention | 9.06 | 9.01 | 8.24 |
| ORT (python) | 4.32 | 2.63 | 2.50 |
### ViTs
All data in millisecond (ms).
| ViTs | With Attention | Without Attention | ORT |
| -------- | -------------- | ----------------- | ------ |
| vit_b_16 | 302.77 | 365.35 | 109.70 |
| vit_b_32 | 89.92 | 116.22 | 30.36 |
| vit_l_16 | 1593.32 | 1730.74 | 419.92 |
| vit_l_32 | 468.11 | 577.41 | 134.12 |
| VitTrack | 3.80 | 3.87 | 2.25 |
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Check Checkerboard Corners #24546
What I did was get you to pull out of findChessboardCorners cornres the whole part that "checks" and sorts the corners of the checkerboard if present.
The main reason for this is that findChessboardCorners is often very slow to find the corners and this depends in that the size the contrast etc of the checkerboards can be very different from each other and writing a function that works on all kinds of images is complicated.
So I find it very useful to have the ability to write your own code to process the image and then have a function that controls or orders the corners.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Add experimental support for Apple VisionOS platform #24136
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
This is dependent on cmake support for VisionOs which is currently in progress.
Creating PR now to test that there are no regressions in iOS and macOS builds
Add blobrecttoimage #24539
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
resolves https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/14659
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work #14659
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
dnn: refactor ONNX MatMul with fastGemm #24694
Done:
- [x] add backends
- [x] CUDA
- [x] OpenVINO
- [x] CANN
- [x] OpenCL
- [x] Vulkan
- [x] add perf tests
- [x] const B case
### Benchmark
Tests are done on M1. All data is in milliseconds (ms).
| Configuration | MatMul (Prepacked) | MatMul | InnerProduct |
| - | - | - | - |
| A=[12, 197, 197], B=[12, 197, 64], trans_a=0, trans_b=0 | **0.39** | 0.41 | 1.33 |
| A=[12, 197, 64], B=[12, 64, 197], trans_a=0, trans_b=0 | **0.42** | 0.42 | 1.17 |
| A=[12, 50, 64], B=[12, 64, 50], trans_a=0, trans_b=0 | **0.13** | 0.15 | 0.33 |
| A=[12, 50, 50], B=[12, 50, 64], trans_a=0, trans_b=0 | **0.11** | 0.13 | 0.22 |
| A=[16, 197, 197], B=[16, 197, 64], trans_a=0, trans_b=0 | **0.46** | 0.54 | 1.46 |
| A=[16, 197, 64], B=[16, 64, 197], trans_a=0, trans_b=0 | **0.46** | 0.95 | 1.74 |
| A=[16, 50, 64], B=[16, 64, 50], trans_a=0, trans_b=0 | **0.18** | 0.32 | 0.43 |
| A=[16, 50, 50], B=[16, 50, 64], trans_a=0, trans_b=0 | **0.15** | 0.25 | 0.25 |
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Add support for Orbbec Gemini2 and Gemini2 XL camera #24666
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
Make default axis of softmax in onnx "-1" without opset option #24613
Try to solve problem: https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/24476#discussion_r1404821158
**ONNX**
`opset <= 11` use 1
`else` use -1
**TensorFlow**
`TF version = 2.x` use -1
`else` use 1
**Darknet, Caffe, Torch**
use 1 by definition
G-API: Support CoreML Execution Providers for ONNXRT Backend #24068
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [ ] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [ ] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
G-API: Get input model layout from the IR if possible in OV 2.0 backend #24658
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Classify and extend convolution and depthwise performance tests #24547
This PR aims to:
1. Extend the test cases from models: `YOLOv5`, `YOLOv8`, `EfficientNet`, `YOLOX`, `YuNet`, `SFace`, `MPPalm`, `MPHand`, `MPPose`, `ViTTrack`, `PPOCRv3`, `CRNN`, `PPHumanSeg`. (371 new test cases are added)
2. Classify the existing convolution performance test to below cases
- CONV_1x1
- CONV_3x3_S1_D1 (winograd)
- CONV
- DEPTHWISE
3. Reduce unnecessary test cases by follow 3 rules (366 test cases are pruned):
(i). For all tests, except for pad and bias related parameters, all other parameters are the same. Only one case can be reserved.
(ii). When the only difference is the channel of input shape, and other parameters are the same. Only one case can be reserved in each range `[1, 3], [4, 7], [8, 15], [16, 31], [32, 63], [64, 127], [128, 255], [256, 511], [512, 1023], [1024, 2047], [2048, 4095]`
(iii). When the only difference is the width and height of input shape, and other parameters are the same. Only one case can be reserved in each range `[1, 31], [32, 63], [64, 95]... `
> **Reproduced**: 1. follow step in https://github.com/alalek/opencv/commit/dnn_dump_conv_kernels to dump all convolution cases from new models. (declared flops may not right, need to be checked manually) 2 and 3. Use the script from python code [classify conv.txt](https://github.com/opencv/opencv/files/13522228/classify.conv.txt)
**Performance test result on Apple M2**
**Test result details**: [M2.md](https://github.com/opencv/opencv/files/13379189/M2.md)
**Additional test result details with FP16**: [m2_results_with_fp16.zip](https://github.com/opencv/opencv/files/13491070/m2_results_with_fp16.zip)
**Brief summary for 4.8.1 vs 4.7.0 or 4.6.0**:
1. `CONV_1x1_S1_D1` dropped significant with small or large input shape.
2. `DEPTHWISE_5x5 ` dropped a little compared with 4.7.0.
---
**Performance test result on [Intel Core i7-12700K](https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/sku/134594/intel-core-i712700k-processor-25m-cache-up-to-5-00-ghz/specifications.html)**: 8 Performance-cores (3.60 GHz, turbo up to 4.90 GHz), 4 Efficient-cores (2.70 GHz, turbo up to 3.80 GHz), 20 threads.
**Test result details**: [INTEL.md](https://github.com/opencv/opencv/files/13374093/INTEL.md)
**Brief summary for 4.8.1 vs 4.5.5**:
1. `CONV_5x5_S1_D1` dropped significant.
2. `CONV_1x1_S1_D1`, `CONV_3x3_S1_D1`, `DEPTHWISE_3x3_S1_D1`, `DEPTHWISW_3x3_S2_D1` dropped with small input shape.
---
TODO:
- [x] Perform tests on arm with each opencv version
- [x] Perform tests on x86 with each opencv version
- [x] Split each test classification with single test config
- [x] test enable fp16
Speed up ChessBoardDetector::findQuadNeighbors #24605
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
Replaced brute-force algorithm with O(N^2) time complexity with kd-tree with something like O(N * log N) time complexity (maybe only in average case).
For example, on image from #23558 without quads filtering (by using `CALIB_CB_FILTER_QUADS` flag) finding chessboards corners took ~770 seconds on my laptop, of which finding quads neighbors took ~620 seconds.
Now finding chessboards corners takes ~155-160 seconds, of which finding quads neighbors takes only ~5-10 seconds.
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Add test for YoloX Yolo v6 and Yolo v8 #24611
This PR adds test for YOLOv6 model (which was absent before)
The onnx weights for the test are located in this PR [ #1126](https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1126)
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
