C-API cleanup: apps, imgproc_c and some constants #25075
Merge with https://github.com/opencv/opencv_contrib/pull/3642
* Removed obsolete apps - traincascade and createsamples (please use older OpenCV versions if you need them). These apps relied heavily on C-API
* removed all mentions of imgproc C-API headers (imgproc_c.h, types_c.h) - they were empty, included core C-API headers
* replaced usage of several C constants with C++ ones (error codes, norm modes, RNG modes, PCA modes, ...) - most part of this PR (split into two parts - all modules and calib+3d - for easier backporting)
* removed imgproc C-API headers (as separate commit, so that other changes could be backported to 4.x)
Most of these changes can be backported to 4.x.
First proposal of cv::remap with relative displacement field (#24603) #24621
Implements #24603
Currently, `remap()` is applied as `dst(x, y) <- src(mapX(x, y), mapY(x, y))` It means that the maps must be filled with absolute coordinates.
However, if one wants to remap something according to a displacement field ("warp"), the operation should be `dst(x, y) <- src(x+displacementX(x, y), y+displacementY(x, y))`
It is trivial to build a mapping from a displacement field, but it is an undesirable overhead for CPU and memory.
This PR implements the feature as an experimental option, through the optional flag WARP_RELATIVE_MAP than can be ORed to the interpolation mode.
Since the xy maps might be const, there is no attempt to add the coordinate offset to those maps, and everything is postponed on-the-fly to the very last coordinate computation before fetching `src`. Interestingly, this let `cv::convertMaps()` unchanged since the fractional part of interpolation does not care of the integer coordinate offset.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [X] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [X] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [X] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [X] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [X] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
* started adding support for new types (16f, 16bf, 32u, 64u, 64s) to arithmetic functions
* fixed several tests; refactored and extended sum(), extended inRange().
* extended countNonZero(), mean(), meanStdDev(), minMaxIdx(), norm() and sum() to support new types (F16, BF16, U32, U64, S64)
* put missing CV_DEPTH_MAX to some function dispatcher tables
* extended findnonzero, hasnonzero with the new types support
* extended mixChannels() to support new types
* minor fix
* fixed a few compile errors on Linux and a few failures in core tests
* fixed a few more warnings and test failures
* trying to fix the remaining warnings and test failures. The test `MulTestGPU.MathOpTest` was disabled - not clear whether to set tolerance - it's not bit-exact operation, as possibly assumed by the test, due to the use of scale and possibly limited accuracy of the intermediate floating-point calculations.
* found that in the current snapshot G-API produces incorrect results in Mul, Div and AddWeighted (at least when using OpenCL on Windows x64 or MacOS x64). Disabled the respective tests.
Fix race condition in color_lab.cpp initLabTabs(). #24581
There is a race condition between when the static bool is initialized (which is thread safe) and its value check. This PR changes the static bool to a static lambda call to make it thread safe. The static_cast<void> in the end is to prevent unused variables warnings.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
Fix out of image corners in cv::cornerSubPix #24527
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Handle huge images in IPP distanceTransform #24535
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
* Do not use IPP for huge Mat (reproduced with https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/23895#issuecomment-1708132367 on `DIST_MASK_5`)
I have observed two types of errors on the reproducer from the issue:
1. When `temp` is not allocated:
```
Thread 1 "app" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00007ffff65dc755 in icv_l9_ownDistanceTransform_5x5_8u32f_C1R_21B_g9e9 () from /home/dkurtaev/opencv_install/bin/../lib/libopencv_imgproc.so.408
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007ffff65dc755 in icv_l9_ownDistanceTransform_5x5_8u32f_C1R_21B_g9e9 () from /home/dkurtaev/opencv_install/bin/../lib/libopencv_imgproc.so.408
#1 0x00007ffff659e8df in icv_l9_ippiDistanceTransform_5x5_8u32f_C1R () from /home/dkurtaev/opencv_install/bin/../lib/libopencv_imgproc.so.408
#2 0x00007ffff5c390f0 in cv::distanceTransform (_src=..., _dst=..., _labels=..., distType=2, maskSize=5, labelType=1) at /home/dkurtaev/opencv/modules/imgproc/src/distransform.cpp:854
#3 0x00007ffff5c396ef in cv::distanceTransform (_src=..., _dst=..., distanceType=2, maskSize=5, dstType=5) at /home/dkurtaev/opencv/modules/imgproc/src/distransform.cpp:903
#4 0x000055555555669e in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffdef8) at /home/dkurtaev/main.cpp:18
```
2. When we keep `temp` allocated every time:
```
OpenCV(4.8.0-dev) Error: Assertion failed (udata < (uchar*)ptr && ((uchar*)ptr - udata) <= (ptrdiff_t)(sizeof(void*)+64)) in fastFree, file /home/dkurtaev/opencv/modules/core/src/alloc.cpp, line 191
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'cv::Exception'
what(): OpenCV(4.8.0-dev) /home/dkurtaev/opencv/modules/core/src/alloc.cpp:191: error: (-215:Assertion failed) udata < (uchar*)ptr && ((uchar*)ptr - udata) <= (ptrdiff_t)(sizeof(void*)+64) in function 'fastFree'
```
* Try enable IPP for 3x3 (see https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/15904)
* Reduce memory footprint with IPP
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Speed up line merging in INTER_AREA #24412
This provides a 10 to 20% speed-up.
Related perf test fix: https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/24417
This is a split of https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/23525 that will be updated to only deal with column merging.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Implement color conversion from RGB to YUV422 family #24333
Related PR for extra: https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1104
Hi,
This patch provides CPU and OpenCL implementations of color conversions from RGB/BGR to YUV422 family (such as UYVY and YUY2).
These features would come in useful for enabling standard RGB images to be supplied as input to algorithms or networks that make use of images in YUV422 format directly (for example, on resource constrained devices working with camera images captured in YUV422).
The code, tests and perf tests are all written following the existing pattern. There is also an example `bin/example_cpp_cvtColor_RGB2YUV422` that loads an image from disk, converts it from BGR to UYVY and then back to BGR, and displays the result as a visual check that the conversion works.
The OpenCL performance for the forward conversion implemented here is the same as the existing backward conversion on my hardware. The CPU implementation, unfortunately, isn't very optimized as I am not yet familiar with the SIMD code.
Please let me know if I need to fix something or can make other modifications.
Thanks!
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Rewrite Universal Intrinsic code: float related part #24325
The goal of this series of PRs is to modify the SIMD code blocks guarded by CV_SIMD macro: rewrite them by using the new Universal Intrinsic API.
The series of PRs is listed below:
#23885 First patch, an example
#23980 Core module
#24058 ImgProc module, part 1
#24132 ImgProc module, part 2
#24166 ImgProc module, part 3
#24301 Features2d and calib3d module
#24324 Gapi module
This patch (hopefully) is the last one in the series.
This patch mainly involves 3 parts
1. Add some modifications related to float (CV_SIMD_64F)
2. Use `#if (CV_SIMD || CV_SIMD_SCALABLE)` instead of `#if CV_SIMD || CV_SIMD_SCALABLE`,
then we can get the `CV_SIMD` module that is not enabled for `CV_SIMD_SCALABLE` by looking for `if CV_SIMD`
3. Summary of `CV_SIMD` blocks that remains unmodified: Updated comments
- Some blocks will cause test fail when enable for RVV, marked as `TODO: enable for CV_SIMD_SCALABLE, ....`
- Some blocks can not be rewrited directly. (Not commented in the source code, just listed here)
- ./modules/core/src/mathfuncs_core.simd.hpp (Vector type wrapped in class/struct)
- ./modules/imgproc/src/color_lab.cpp (Array of vector type)
- ./modules/imgproc/src/color_rgb.simd.hpp (Array of vector type)
- ./modules/imgproc/src/sumpixels.simd.hpp (fixed length algorithm, strongly ralated with `CV_SIMD_WIDTH`)
These algorithms will need to be redesigned to accommodate scalable backends.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [ ] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [ ] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
* attempt to add 0d/1d mat support to OpenCV
* revised the patch; now 1D mat is treated as 1xN 2D mat rather than Nx1.
* a step towards 'green' tests
* another little step towards 'green' tests
* calib test failures seem to be fixed now
* more fixes _core & _dnn
* another step towards green ci; even 0D mat's (a.k.a. scalars) are now partly supported!
* * fixed strange bug in aruco/charuco detector, not sure why it did not work
* also fixed a few remaining failures (hopefully) in dnn & core
* disabled failing GAPI tests - too complex to dig into this compiler pipeline
* hopefully fixed java tests
* trying to fix some more tests
* quick followup fix
* continue to fix test failures and warnings
* quick followup fix
* trying to fix some more tests
* partly fixed support for 0D/scalar UMat's
* use updated parseReduce() from upstream
* trying to fix the remaining test failures
* fixed [ch]aruco tests in Python
* still trying to fix tests
* revert "fix" in dnn's CUDA tensor
* trying to fix dnn+CUDA test failures
* fixed 1D umat creation
* hopefully fixed remaining cuda test failures
* removed training whitespaces
Rewrite Universal Intrinsic code: ImgProc (CV_SIMD_WIDTH related Part) #24166
Related PR: #24058, #24132. The goal of this series of PRs is to modify the SIMD code blocks in the opencv/modules/imgproc folder by using the new Universal Intrinsic API.
The modification of this PR mainly focuses on the code that uses the `CV_SIMD_WIDTH` macro. This macro is sometimes used for loop tail processing, such as `box_filter.simd.hpp` and `morph.simd.hpp`.
```cpp
#if CV_SIMD
int i = 0;
for (i < n - v_uint16::nlanes; i += v_uint16::nlanes) {
// some universal intrinsic code
// e.g. v_uint16...
}
#if CV_SIMD_WIDTH > 16
for (i < n - v_uint16x8::nlanes; i += v_uint16x8::nlanes) {
// handle loop tail by 128 bit SIMD
// e.g. v_uint16x8
}
#endif //CV_SIMD_WIDTH
#endif// CV_SIMD
```
The main contradiction is that the variable-length Universal Intrinsic backend cannot use 128bit fixed-length data structures. Therefore, this PR uses the scalar loop to handle the loop tail.
This PR is marked as draft because the modification of the `box_filter.simd.hpp` file caused a compilation error. The cause of the error is initially believed to be due to an internal error in the GCC compiler.
```bash
box_filter.simd.hpp:1162:5: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
1162 | }
| ^
0xe03883 crash_signal
/wafer/share/gcc/gcc/toplev.cc:314
0x7ff261c4251f ???
./signal/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/libc_sigaction.c:0
0x6bde48 hash_set<rtl_ssa::set_info*, false, default_hash_traits<rtl_ssa::set_info*> >::iterator::operator*()
/wafer/share/gcc/gcc/hash-set.h:125
0x6bde48 extract_single_source
/wafer/share/gcc/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc:1184
0x6bde48 extract_single_source
/wafer/share/gcc/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc:1174
0x119ad9e pass_vsetvl::propagate_avl() const
/wafer/share/gcc/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc:4087
0x119ceaf pass_vsetvl::execute(function*)
/wafer/share/gcc/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc:4344
0x119ceaf pass_vsetvl::execute(function*)
/wafer/share/gcc/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc:4325
Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source (by using -freport-bug).
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
```
This PR can be compiled with Clang 16, and `opencv_test_imgproc` is passed on QEMU.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [ ] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [ ] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Rewrite Universal Intrinsic code by using new API: ImgProc module Part 2 #24132
The goal of this series of PRs is to modify the SIMD code blocks guarded by CV_SIMD macro in the opencv/modules/imgproc folder: rewrite them by using the new Universal Intrinsic API.
This is the second part of the modification to the Imgproc module ( Part 1: #24058 ), And I tested this patch on RVV (QEMU) and AVX devices, `opencv_test_imgproc` is passed.
The patch is partially auto-generated by using the [rewriter](https://github.com/hanliutong/rewriter).
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [ ] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [ ] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Rewrite Universal Intrinsic code by using new API: ImgProc module. #24058
The goal of this series of PRs is to modify the SIMD code blocks guarded by CV_SIMD macro in the `opencv/modules/imgproc` folder: rewrite them by using the new Universal Intrinsic API.
For easier review, this PR includes a part of the rewritten code, and another part will be brought in the next PR (coming soon). I tested this patch on RVV (QEMU) and AVX devices, `opencv_test_imgproc` is passed.
The patch is partially auto-generated by using the [rewriter](https://github.com/hanliutong/rewriter), related PR https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/23885 and https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/23980.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [ ] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [ ] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Fix distanceTransform for inputs with large step and height #24214
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
resolves https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/23895
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Minor optimization of two lines intersection #24216
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
Not significant, but we can reduce number of multiplications while compute two lines intersection. Both methods are used heavily in their modules.
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
* core:add OPENCV_IPP_MEAN/MINMAX/SUM option to enable IPP optimizations
* fix: to use guard HAVE_IPP and ocv_append_source_file_compile_definitions() macro.
* support OPENCV_IPP_ENABLE_ALL
* add document for OPENCV_IPP_ENABLE_ALL
* fix OPENCV_IPP_ENABLE_ALL comment
* started working on adding 32u, 64u, 64s, bool and 16bf types to OpenCV
* core & imgproc tests seem to pass
* fixed a few compile errors and test failures on macOS x86
* hopefully fixed some compile problems and test failures
* fixed some more warnings and test failures
* trying to fix small deviations in perf_core & perf_imgproc by revering randf_64f to exact version used before
* trying to fix behavior of the new OpenCV with old plugins; there is (quite strong) assumption that video capture would give us frames with depth == CV_8U (0) or CV_16U (2). If depth is > 7 then it means that the plugin is built with the old OpenCV. It needs to be recompiled, of course and then this hack can be removed.
* try to repair the case when target arch does not have FP64 SIMD
* 1. fixed bug in itoa() found by alalek
2. restored ==, !=, > and < univ. intrinsics on ARM32/ARM64.
Fix harmless ASAN error. #24042
For an empty radius, &v[0] would be accessed (though the called functions would not use it due to v.size() being 0). Also add checks for emptyness and fix the first element checks, in case we get INT_MAX to compare to.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
C++20 made it invalid to use simple-template-ids for constructors and destructors: https://eel.is/c++draft/diff.cpp17.class#2
GCC 11 and later throw an error on this, with the unhelpful message `expected unqualified-id before ')' token`. This PR fixes the problem.
Fix imgwarp at borders when transparent. #23922
I believe this is a proper fix to #23562
The PR #23754 overwrites data while that should not be the case with transparent data. The original test is failing because points at the border do not get computed because they do not have 4 neighbors to be computed. Still ,we can approximate their computation with whatever neighbors that are available.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
