* added v_erf and implemented gelu acceleration via vectorization
* remove anonymous v_erf and use v_erf from intrin_math
* enable perf for ov and cuda backend
Merge pull request #25861 from Abdurrahheem:ash/torch-attention-export-fix-4x
Support for Unflatten operation requred by Attention layer - 4.x #25861
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
All test data and models for PR are located [#1190](https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1190)
This PR fixes issue reised when importing batched vanilla `Attention` layer from `PyTorch` via ONNX. Currently batched version of `Attention` layer in PyTorch [has unflatten operation inside](e3b3431c42/torch/nn/functional.py (L5500C17-L5500C31)). `unflatten` operation causes issue in `reshape` layer (see the Reshape_2 in the graph below) due to incorrect output of `slice` layer. This PR particularly fixes `slice` and `concat` layers to handle `unflatten` operation.
<img width="673" alt="image" src="https://github.com/opencv/opencv/assets/44877829/5b612b31-657a-47f1-83a4-0ac35a950abd">
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Add sample support of YOLOv9 and YOLOv10 in OpenCV #25794
This PR adds sample support of [`YOLOv9`](https://github.com/WongKinYiu/yolov9) and [`YOLOv10`](https://github.com/THU-MIG/yolov10/tree/main)) in OpenCV. Models for this test are located in this [PR](https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1186).
**Running YOLOv10 using OpenCV.**
1. In oder to run `YOLOv10` one needs to cut off postporcessing with dynamic shapes from torch and then convert it to ONNX. If someone is looking for ready solution, there is [this forked branch](https://github.com/Abdurrahheem/yolov10/tree/ash/opencv-export) from official YOLOv10. Particularty follow this proceduce.
```bash
git clone git@github.com:Abdurrahheem/yolov10.git
conda create -n yolov10 python=3.9
conda activate yolov10
pip install -r requirements.txt
python export_opencv.py --model=<model-name> --imgsz=<input-img-size>
```
By default `model="yolov10s"` and `imgsz=(480,640)`. This will generate file `yolov10s.onnx`, which can be use for inference in OpenCV
2. For inference part on OpenCV. one can use `yolo_detector.cpp` [sample](https://github.com/opencv/opencv/blob/4.x/samples/dnn/yolo_detector.cpp). If you have followed above exporting procedure, then you can use following command to run the model.
``` bash
build opencv from source
cd build
./bin/example_dnn_yolo_detector --model=<path-to-yolov10s.onnx-file> --yolo=yolov10 --width=640 --height=480 --input=<path-to-image> --scale=0.003921568627 --padvalue=114
```
If you do not specify `--input` argument, OpenCV will grab first camera that is avaliable on your platform.
For more deatils on how to run the `yolo_detector.cpp` file see this [guide](https://docs.opencv.org/4.x/da/d9d/tutorial_dnn_yolo.html#autotoc_md443)
**Running YOLOv9 using OpenCV**
1. Export model following [official guide](https://github.com/WongKinYiu/yolov9)of the YOLOv9 repository. Particularly you can do following for converting.
```bash
git clone https://github.com/WongKinYiu/yolov9.git
cd yolov9
conda create -n yolov9 python=3.9
conda activate yolov9
pip install -r requirements.txt
wget https://github.com/WongKinYiu/yolov9/releases/download/v0.1/yolov9-t-converted.pt
python export.py --weights=./yolov9-t-converted.pt --include=onnx --img-size=(480,640)
```
This will generate <yolov9-t-converted.onnx> file.
2. Inference on OpenCV.
```bash
build opencv from source
cd build
./bin/example_dnn_yolo_detector --model=<path-to-yolov9-t-converted.onnx> --yolo=yolov9 --width=640 --height=480 --scale=0.003921568627 --padvalue=114 --path=<path-to-image>
```
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Added int support for OpenVINO dnn backend #25458
Modified dnn OpenVINO integration to support type inference and int operations.
Added OpenVINO support to Cast, CumSum, Expand, Gather, GatherElements, Scatter, ScatterND, Tile layers.
I tried to add Reduce layer, but looks like OpenVINO uses float values inside Reduce operation so it can't pass our int tests.
OpenVINO uses int32 precision for int64 operations, so I've modified input values for int64 tests when backend is OpenVINO.
OpenVINO has a strange behavior with custom layers and int64 values. After model compilation OpenVINO may change types, so the model can have different output type. That's why these tests were disabled:
- Test_ArgMax_Int.random/0, where GetParam() = (4, NGRAPH/CPU)
- Test_ArgMax_Int.random/6, where GetParam() = (11, NGRAPH/CPU)
- Test_Reduce_Int.random/6, where GetParam() = (11, NGRAPH/CPU)
- Test_Reduce_Int.two_axes/6, where GetParam() = (11, NGRAPH/CPU)
Also these tests were temporary disabled, they didn't work on both 4.x and 5.x branches:
- Test_Caffe_layers.layer_prelu_fc/0, where GetParam() = NGRAPH/CPU
- Test_ONNX_layers.LSTM_Activations/0, where GetParam() = NGRAPH/CPU
- Test_ONNX_layers.Quantized_Convolution/0, where GetParam() = NGRAPH/CPU
- Test_ONNX_layers.Quantized_Eltwise_Scalar/0, where GetParam() = NGRAPH/CPU
- Test_TFLite.EfficientDet_int8/0, where GetParam() = NGRAPH/CPU
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Fixed ONNX Range layer to support any input type #25492
Fixed ONNX Range layer to support any input type
Extra PR: https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1173Fixes#25363
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Fixed ONNX range layer #25414
Partially address https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/25363
Fixed ONNX range layer. It should support any input type.
Added tests (extra [PR](https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1170))
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Added int tests for CumSum, Scatter, Tile and ReduceSum dnn layers #25277
Fixed bug in tile layer.
Fixed bug in reduce layer by reimplementing the layer.
Fixed types filter in Scatter and ScatterND layers
PR for extra: https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1161
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
[BugFix] dnn (ONNX): Foce dropping constant inputs in parseClip if they are shared #25319
Resolves https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/25278
Merge with https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1165
In Gold-YOLO ,`Div` has a constant input `B=6` which is then parsed into a `Const` layer in the ONNX importer, but `Clip` also has the shared constant input `max=6` which is already a `Const` layer and then connected to `Elementwise` layer. This should not happen because in the `forward()` of `Elementwise` layer, the legacy code goes through and apply activation to each input. More details on https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/25278#issuecomment-2032199630.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Merge with https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1158
Todo:
- [x] Fix Attention pattern recognition.
- [x] Handle other backends.
Benchmark:
"VIT_B_32 OCV/CPU", M1, results in milliseconds.
| Model | 4.x | This PR |
| - | - | - |
| VIT_B_32 OCV/CPU | 87.66 | **83.83** |
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Release convolution weightsMat after usage #25181
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
related (but not resolved): https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/24134
Minor memory footprint improvement. Also, adds a test for VmHWM.
RAM top memory usage (-230MB)
| YOLOv3 (237MB file) | 4.x | PR |
|---------------------|---------|---------|
| no winograd | 808 MB | 581 MB |
| winograd | 1985 MB | 1750 MB |
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Added int32, int64 support and type inference to dnn #24411
**Added a type inference to dnn similar to the shape inference, added int32 and int64 support.**
- Added getTypes method for layers that calculates layer outputs types and internals types from inputs types (Similar to getMemoryShapes). By default outputs and internals types = input[0] type
- Added type inference pipeline similar to shape inference pipeline. LayersShapes struct (that is used in shape inference pipeline) now contains both shapes and types
- All layers output blobs are now allocated using the calculated types from the type inference.
- Inputs and constants with int32 and int64 types are not automatically converted into float32 now.
- Added int32 and int64 support for all the layers with indexing and for all the layers required in tests.
Added int32 and int64 support for CUDA:
- Added host<->device data moving for int32 and int64
- Added int32 and int64 support for several layers (just slightly modified CUDA C++ templates)
Passed all the accuracy tests on CPU, OCL, OCL_FP16, CUDA, CUDA_FP16. (except RAFT model)
**CURRENT PROBLEMS**:
- ONNX parser always converts int64 constants and layers attributes to int32, so some models with int64 constants doesn't work (e.g. RAFT). The solution is to disable int64->int32 conversion and fix attributes reading in a lot of ONNX layers parsers (https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/25102)
- I didn't add type inference and int support to VULCAN, so it doesn't work at all now.
- Some layers don't support int yet, so some unknown models may not work.
**CURRENT WORKAROUNDS**:
- CPU arg_layer indides are implemented in int32 followed by a int32->int64 conversion (the master branch has the same workaround with int32->float conversion)
- CPU and OCL pooling_layer indices are implemented in float followed by a float->int64 conversion
- CPU gather_layer indices are implemented in int32, so int64 indices are converted to int32 (the master branch has the same workaround with float->int32 conversion)
**DISABLED TESTS**:
- RAFT model
**REMOVED TESTS**:
- Greater_input_dtype_int64 (because it doesn't fit ONNX rules, the whole test is just comparing float tensor with int constant)
**TODO IN NEXT PULL REQUESTS**:
- Add int64 support for ONNX parser
- Add int support for more layers
- Add int support for OCL (currently int layers just run on CPU)
- Add int tests
- Add int support for other backends
dnn: no layer norm fusion if axes.back() is not the axis of last dimension #24808
Merge with https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1137
Resolves https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/24797
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
dnn onnx: support constaint inputs in einsum importer #24753
Merge with https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1132.
Resolves https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/24697
Credits to @LaurentBerger.
---
This is a workaround. I suggest to get input shapes and calculate the output shapes in `getMemoryShapes` so as to keep the best compatibility. It is not always robust getting shapes during the importer stage and we should avoid that as much as possible.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
dnn: add attention layer #24476Resolves#24609
Merge with: https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1128.
Attention operator spec from onnxruntime: https://github.com/microsoft/onnxruntime/blob/v1.16.1/docs/ContribOperators.md#com.microsoft.Attention.
TODO:
- [x] benchmark (before this PR vs. with this PR vs. ORT).
- [x] Layer fusion: Take care Slice with end=INT64_MAX.
- [x] Layer fusion: match more potential attention (VIT) patterns.
- [x] Single-head attention is supported.
- [x] Test AttentionSubgraph fusion.
- [x] Add acc tests for VIT_B_32 and VitTrack
- [x] Add perf tests for VIT_B_32 and VitTrack
## Benchmarks
Platform: Macbook Air M1.
### Attention Subgraph
Input scale: [1, 197, 768].
| | mean (ms) | median (ms) | min (ms) |
| ---------------------- | --------- | ----------- | -------- |
| w/ Attention (this PR) | 3.75 | 3.68 | 3.22 |
| w/o Attention | 9.06 | 9.01 | 8.24 |
| ORT (python) | 4.32 | 2.63 | 2.50 |
### ViTs
All data in millisecond (ms).
| ViTs | With Attention | Without Attention | ORT |
| -------- | -------------- | ----------------- | ------ |
| vit_b_16 | 302.77 | 365.35 | 109.70 |
| vit_b_32 | 89.92 | 116.22 | 30.36 |
| vit_l_16 | 1593.32 | 1730.74 | 419.92 |
| vit_l_32 | 468.11 | 577.41 | 134.12 |
| VitTrack | 3.80 | 3.87 | 2.25 |
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Add test for YoloX Yolo v6 and Yolo v8 #24611
This PR adds test for YOLOv6 model (which was absent before)
The onnx weights for the test are located in this PR [ #1126](https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1126)
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Add yolov5n to tests #24553
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [ X] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [ X] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ X] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ X] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ X] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ X] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
* add Winograd FP16 implementation
* fixed dispatching of FP16 code paths in dnn; use dynamic dispatcher only when NEON_FP16 is enabled in the build and the feature is present in the host CPU at runtime
* fixed some warnings
* hopefully fixed winograd on x64 (and maybe other platforms)
---------
Co-authored-by: Vadim Pisarevsky <vadim.pisarevsky@gmail.com>
dnn test: move layer norm tests into conformance tests #24544
Merge with https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1122
## Motivation
Some ONNX operators, such as `LayerNormalization`, `BatchNormalization` and so on, produce outputs for training (mean, stdev). So they have reference outputs of conformance tests for those training outputs as well. However, when it comes to inference, we do not need and produce those outputs for training here in dnn. Hence, output size does not match if we use dnn to infer those conformance models. This has become the barrier if we want to test these operators using their conformance tests.
<!--
| Operator | Inference needed | Outputs (required - total) | Optional outputs for training? |
| ----------------------- | ----------------------------------- | -------------------------- | ------------------------------ |
| BatchNormalization | Yes | 1 - 3 | Yes |
| Dropout | Maybe, can be eliminated via fusion | 1 - 2 | Yes |
| GRU | Yes | 0 - 2 | No |
| LSTM | Yes | 0 - 3 | No |
| LayerNormalization | Yes | 1 - 3 | Yes |
| MaxPool | Yes | 1 - 2 | Yes |
| RNN | Yes | 0 - 2 | No |
| SoftmaxCrossEntropyLoss | No | 1 - 2 | -- |
-->
**I checked all ONNX operators with optional outputs. Turns out there are only `BatchNormalization`, `Dropout`, `LayerNormalization` and `MaxPool` has optional outputs for training. All except `LayerNormalization` have models set for training mode and eval mode. Blame ONNX for that.**
## Solution
In this pull request, we remove graph outputs if the graph looks like the following:
```
[X] [Scale] [Bias] [X] [Scale] [Bias]
\ | / this patch \ | /
LayerNormalization -----------> LayerNormalization
/ | \ |
[Y] [Mean] [Stdev] [Y]
```
We can update conformance tests and turn on some cases as well if extending to more layers.
Notes:
1. This workaround does not solve expanded function operators if they are fused into a single operator, such as `$onnx/onnx/backend/test/data/node/test_layer_normalization_2d_axis1_expanded`, but they can be run without fusion. Note that either dnn or onnxruntime does not fuse those expanded function operators.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Ellipses supported added for Einsum Layer #24322
This PR added addresses issues not covered in #24037. Namely these are:
Test case for this patch is in this PR [#1106](https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1106) in opencv extra
Added:
- [x] Broadcasting reduction "...ii ->...I"
- [x] Add lazy shape deduction. "...ij, ...jk->...ik"
Features to add:
- [ ] Add implicit output computation support. "bij,bjk ->" (output subscripts should be "bik")
- [ ] Add support for CUDA backend
- [ ] BatchWiseMultiply optimize
- [ ] Performance test
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
GSoC Add ONNX Support for GatherElements #24092
Merge with: https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1082
Adds support to the ONNX operator GatherElements [operator docs](https://github.com/onnx/onnx/blob/main/docs/Operators.md#GatherElements)
Added tests to opencv_extra at pull request https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1082
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Fixed CumSum layer inplace flag #24367
When exclusive is false:
dst[i] = dst[i-1] + src[i]
When exclusive is true:
dst[i] = dst[i-1] + src[i-1]
So CumSum layer can be inplace only when exclusive flag is false.
* remove Conformance from test names
* integrate neon optimization into default
* quick fix: define CV_NEON_AARCH64 0 for non NEON platforms
* remove var batch that leads to memory leak
* put neon code back to fast_gemm_kernels.simd
* reorganize code to reduce duplicate code
OpenVINO backend for INT8 models #23987
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
TODO:
- [x] DetectionOutput layer (https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/24069)
- [x] Less FP32 fallbacks (i.e. Sigmoid, eltwise sum)
- [x] Accuracy, performance tests (https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/24039)
- [x] Single layer tests (convolution)
- [x] ~~Fixes for OpenVINO 2022.1 (https://pullrequest.opencv.org/buildbot/builders/precommit_custom_linux/builds/100334)~~
Performace results for object detection model `coco_efficientdet_lite0_v1_1.0_quant_2021_09_06.tflite`:
| backend | performance (median time) |
|---|---|
| OpenCV | 77.42ms |
| OpenVINO 2023.0 | 10.90ms |
CPU: `11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-1135G7 @ 2.40GHz`
Serialized model per-layer stats (note that Convolution should use `*_I8` primitives if they are quantized correctly): https://gist.github.com/dkurt/7772bbf1907035441bb5454f19f0feef
---
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
