* Add a way to use a JWT in an HTTP only cookie
If a JWT is not included in the Authorization header or a query string, attempt to get a JWT from an HTTP only cookie.
* Added a way to specify allowed origins header from config
* Removed unecessary log
* Check list of domains from config or command flag
* Handle default wildcard and change name of config value to cors
* fix: disallow file name too long when writing a file
* bool LongerName to MaxFilenameLength
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Lebedev <9497591+kmlebedev@users.noreply.github.co>
An etcd cluster is not necessarily only dedicated to seaweedfs.
This security enhancement adds a customizable key_prefix option to the etcd filer store.
This will allow an etcd cluster administrator to limit the seaweedfs etcd user to only read/write a subset of keys under the
key_prefix, instead of all keys on the etcd cluster.
- one JWT for reading and one for writing, analogous to how the JWT
between Master and Volume Server works
- I did not implement IP `whiteList` parameter on the filer
Additionally, because http_util.DownloadFile now sets the JWT,
the `download` command should now work when `jwt.signing.read` is
configured. By looking at the code, I think this case did not work
before.
## Docs to be adjusted after a release
Page `Amazon-S3-API`:
```
# Authentication with Filer
You can use mTLS for the gRPC connection between S3-API-Proxy and the filer, as
explained in [Security-Configuration](Security-Configuration) -
controlled by the `grpc.*` configuration in `security.toml`.
Starting with version XX, it is also possible to authenticate the HTTP
operations between the S3-API-Proxy and the Filer (especially
uploading new files). This is configured by setting
`filer_jwt.signing.key` and `filer_jwt.signing.read.key` in
`security.toml`.
With both configurations (gRPC and JWT), it is possible to have Filer
and S3 communicate in fully authenticated fashion; so Filer will reject
any unauthenticated communication.
```
Page `Security Overview`:
```
The following items are not covered, yet:
- master server http REST services
Starting with version XX, the Filer HTTP REST services can be secured
with a JWT, by setting `filer_jwt.signing.key` and
`filer_jwt.signing.read.key` in `security.toml`.
...
Before version XX: "weed filer -disableHttp", disable http operations, only gRPC operations are allowed. This works with "weed mount" by FUSE. It does **not work** with the [S3 Gateway](Amazon S3 API), as this does HTTP calls to the Filer.
Starting with version XX: secured by JWT, by setting `filer_jwt.signing.key` and `filer_jwt.signing.read.key` in `security.toml`. **This now works with the [S3 Gateway](Amazon S3 API).**
...
# Securing Filer HTTP with JWT
To enable JWT-based access control for the Filer,
1. generate `security.toml` file by `weed scaffold -config=security`
2. set `filer_jwt.signing.key` to a secret string - and optionally filer_jwt.signing.read.key` as well to a secret string
3. copy the same `security.toml` file to the filers and all S3 proxies.
If `filer_jwt.signing.key` is configured: When sending upload/update/delete HTTP operations to a filer server, the request header `Authorization` should be the JWT string (`Authorization: Bearer [JwtToken]`). The operation is authorized after the filer validates the JWT with `filer_jwt.signing.key`.
If `filer_jwt.signing.read.key` is configured: When sending GET or HEAD requests to a filer server, the request header `Authorization` should be the JWT string (`Authorization: Bearer [JwtToken]`). The operation is authorized after the filer validates the JWT with `filer_jwt.signing.read.key`.
The S3 API Gateway reads the above JWT keys and sends authenticated
HTTP requests to the filer.
```
Page `Security Configuration`:
```
(update scaffold file)
...
[filer_jwt.signing]
key = "blahblahblahblah"
[filer_jwt.signing.read]
key = "blahblahblahblah"
```
Resolves: #158
tikv is causing "go mod tidy" problem. Need to resolve this before adding tikv back.
go mod tidy
go: finding module for package github.com/coreos/etcd/clientv3/balancer/picker
go: finding module for package cloud.google.com/go/kms/apiv1
go: finding module for package github.com/coreos/etcd/clientv3/balancer/resolver/endpoint
go: finding module for package google.golang.org/grpc/naming
go: finding module for package github.com/coreos/etcd/clientv3/credentials
go: finding module for package github.com/coreos/etcd/clientv3/balancer
go: finding module for package github.com/d4l3k/messagediff
go: found github.com/coreos/etcd/clientv3/balancer in github.com/coreos/etcd v3.3.26+incompatible
go: found github.com/coreos/etcd/clientv3/balancer/picker in github.com/coreos/etcd v3.3.26+incompatible
go: found github.com/coreos/etcd/clientv3/balancer/resolver/endpoint in github.com/coreos/etcd v3.3.26+incompatible
go: found github.com/coreos/etcd/clientv3/credentials in github.com/coreos/etcd v3.3.26+incompatible
go: found cloud.google.com/go/kms/apiv1 in cloud.google.com/go/kms v1.0.0
go: found github.com/d4l3k/messagediff in github.com/d4l3k/messagediff v1.2.1
go: finding module for package google.golang.org/grpc/naming
github.com/chrislusf/seaweedfs/weed/filer/tikv imports
github.com/tikv/client-go/v2/tikv imports
go.etcd.io/etcd/clientv3 tested by
go.etcd.io/etcd/clientv3.test imports
github.com/coreos/etcd/integration imports
github.com/coreos/etcd/proxy/grpcproxy imports
google.golang.org/grpc/naming: module google.golang.org/grpc@latest found (v1.41.0), but does not contain package google.golang.org/grpc/naming
causing go mod tidy problem. If anyone wants this, please help to resolve this first.
github.com/chrislusf/seaweedfs/weed/sequence imports
go.etcd.io/etcd/client tested by
go.etcd.io/etcd/client.test imports
github.com/coreos/etcd/integration imports
github.com/coreos/etcd/proxy/grpcproxy imports
google.golang.org/grpc/naming: module google.golang.org/grpc@latest found (v1.41.0), but does not contain package google.golang.org/grpc/naming
