mirror/tesseract
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tesseract.git synced 2025-06-07 18:02:40 +08:00
Code Issues Actions 10 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

remove info about VS 2008

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Zdenko Podobný 2015-08-20 14:09:29 +02:00
parent 387ae36cd0
commit 07128d8432
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
README.md
View File

@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ Please use the installer (for 3.00 and above). Tesseract is a library with a
command line interface. If you need a GUI, please check the [3rdParty wiki page](https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tesseract/wiki/3rdParty#gui). command line interface. If you need a GUI, please check the [3rdParty wiki page](https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tesseract/wiki/3rdParty#gui).
If you are building from the sources, the recommended build platform is If you are building from the sources, the recommended build platform is
VC++ Express 2008 (optionally 2010). VC++ Express 2010.
The executables are built with static linking, so they stand more chance The executables are built with static linking, so they stand more chance
of working out of the box on more Windows systems. of working out of the box on more Windows systems.
@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ more changes made in 1996 to port to Windows, and some C++izing in 1998.
A lot of the code was written in C, and then some more was written in C++. A lot of the code was written in C, and then some more was written in C++.
Since then all the code has been converted to at least compile with a C++ Since then all the code has been converted to at least compile with a C++
compiler. Currently it builds under Linux with gcc 4.4.3 and under Windows compiler. Currently it builds under Linux with gcc 4.4.3 and under Windows
with VC++2008. The C++ code makes heavy use of a list system using macros. with VC++2010. The C++ code makes heavy use of a list system using macros.
This predates stl, was portable before stl, and is more efficient than stl This predates stl, was portable before stl, and is more efficient than stl
lists, but has the big negative that if you do get a segmentation violation, lists, but has the big negative that if you do get a segmentation violation,
it is hard to debug. it is hard to debug.