The indentation is wrong since commit
fd0683f9e0 and results in a gcc warning:
api/baseapi.cpp: In member function 'bool tesseract::TessBaseAPI::ProcessPagesMultipageTiff(const l_uint8*, size_t, const char*, const char*, int, tesseract::TessResultRenderer*, int)':
api/baseapi.cpp:986:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
if (tessedit_page_number >= 0)
^~
api/baseapi.cpp:988:7: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it is guarded by the 'if'
pix = (data) ? pixReadMemFromMultipageTiff(data, size, &offset)
^~~
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
* Add OPENMP_CXXFLAGS for ccmain.
* Replace OPENMP_CFLAGS by OPENMP_CXXFLAGS.
* Always use _OPENMP for conditional compilation.
* Remove OPENMP as there is already _OPENMP.
* Include omp.h conditionally.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
* Fix builds in subdirectories:
* Add srcdir to Manifest.txt.
* Remove srcdir from piccolo2d-core-3.0.jar and piccolo2d-extras-3.0.jar.
* Add dependency of SCROLLVIEW_CLASSES on SCROLLVIEW_LIBS.
The SCROLLVIEW_LIBS are now automatically fetched when needed.
* Add .PHONY target for fetch-jars.
* Improve rule for clean target.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
See issue #424.
The existing C API for TessBaseAPIDetectOS requires a C caller to successfully allocate struct OSResults which is actually a C++ class. Generally it won't
be possible for a regular C compiler to do this properly.
It's also assumed that most API level users of Tesseract are only interested in Tesseract's best guess as to script and orientation, not the individual values for all possible scripts.
This introduces a new API with a better name that is more closely aligned with the output of 'tesseract -psm 0'. Both tesseract -psm 0 and this API now share the same code in baseapi.cpp.
clang++ report:
api/baseapi.h:852:4: warning:
extra ';' after member function definition [-Wextra-semi]
[...]
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
Commit 03eec61a2f removed unneeded
null pointer checks after new, but missed one which now raises
a warning from coverity scan. Remove that one, too.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
