- pass in ParamsVectors from Tesseract
(carrying values from langdata/config/api)
into LSTMRecognizer::Load and LoadDictionary
- after LSTMRecognizer's Dict is initialised
(with default values), reset the variables
user_{words,patterns}_{suffix,file} from the
corresponding entries in the passed vector
Warning from clang++:
..\src\ccmain\ltrresultiterator.cpp(454,8): warning: expression result unused [-Wunused-value]
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
symbol_steps is a vector, so testing for a nullptr was wrong.
clang++ reports:
..\src\ccmain\ltrresultiterator.cpp(440,19): warning: comparison of address of 'this->word_res_->symbol_steps' equal to a null pointer is always false [-Wtautological-pointer-compare]
if (&word_res_->symbol_steps == nullptr || !LSTM_mode_) return nullptr;
~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
svpaint is a standalone application (it includes a main function)
and should not be part of the Tesseract library.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
Credit to OSS-Fuzz: it found another case which triggered this assertion:
contains_unichar_id(unichar_id):Error:Assert failed:in file ../../src/ccutil/unicharset.h, line 502
This is the OSS-Fuzz testcase:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=13662
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
That runtime error is normally not visible because it does not abort
the program, but is detected when the code was compiled with sanitizers.
It can be triggered with this OSS-Fuzz testcase:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=13662
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
Shift operations are undefined for negative numbers, but at least on
Intel they return the same value as a multiplication with 2 ^ shift value.
This fixes runtime errors reported by sanitizers and OSS-Fuzz:
intmatcher.cpp:821:59: runtime error: left shift of negative value -14
intmatcher.cpp:823:75: runtime error: left shift of negative value -512
intmatcher.cpp:820:50: runtime error: left shift of negative value -80
See issue #2297 and
https://oss-fuzz.com/testcase-detail/4845195990925312 for details.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
This fixes issue #2299, an issue which was already reported by
static code analyzers and now by OSS-Fuzz, see details at
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=13597.
The Tesseract code assigns an address which is out-of-bounds to a pointer
variable, but increments that variable later. So this is a false positive.
Change the code nevertheless to satisfy OSS-Fuzz.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
