It's not clear how ranges argument should be used in the overload of
calcHist that accepts std::vector. The main overload uses array of
arrays there, while std::vector overload uses a plain array. The code
interprets the vector as a flattened array and rebuilds array of arrays
from it. This is not obvious interpretation, so documentation has been
added to explain the expected usage.
different paddings in cvtColorTwoPlane() for biplane YUV420
* Different paddings support in cvtColorTwoPlane() for biplane YUV420
* Build fix for dispatch case.
* Resoted old behaviour for y.step==uv.step to exclude perf regressions.
Co-authored-by: amir.tulegenov <amir.tulegenov@xperience.ai>
Co-authored-by: Alexander Smorkalov <alexander.smorkalov@xperience.ai>
* goodFeaturesToTrack returns also corner value
(cherry picked from commit 4a8f06755c)
* Added response to GFTT Detector keypoints
(cherry picked from commit b88fb40c6e)
* Moved corner values to another optional variable to preserve backward compatibility
(cherry picked from commit 6137383d32)
* Removed corners valus from perf tests and better unit tests for corners values
(cherry picked from commit f3d0ef21a7)
* Fixed detector gftt call
(cherry picked from commit be2975553b)
* Restored test_cornerEigenValsVecs
(cherry picked from commit ea3e11811f)
* scaling fixed;
mineigen calculation rolled back;
gftt function overload added (with quality parameter);
perf tests were added for the new api function;
external bindings were added for the function (with different alias);
fixed issues with composition of the output array of the new function (e.g. as requested in comments) ;
added sanity checks in the perf tests;
removed C API changes.
* minor change to GFTTDetector::detect
* substitute ts->printf with EXPECT_LE
* avoid re-allocations
Co-authored-by: Anas <anas.el.amraoui@live.com>
Co-authored-by: amir.tulegenov <amir.tulegenov@xperience.ai>
Return accumulator value in HoughLines algorithm
* try to solve #17050
use cv_wrap_as
add python test
parameters
* review
* move wrapper to imgproc/bindings.hpp
Bit-exact Nearest Neighbor Resizing
* bit exact resizeNN
* change the value of method enum
* add bitexact-nn to ResizeExactTest
* test to compare with non-exact version
* add perf for bit-exact resizenn
* use cvFloor-equivalent
* 1/3 scaling is not stable for floating calculation
* stricter test
* bugfix: broken data in case of 6 or 12bytes elements
* bugfix: broken data in default pix_size
* stricter threshold
* use raw() for floor
* use double instead of int
* follow code reviews
* fewer cases in perf test
* center pixel convention