Encode QR code data to UTF-8 #24350
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
**Merge with extra**: https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1105
resolves https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/23728
This is first PR in a series. Here we just return a raw Unicode. Later I will try expand QR codes decoding methods to use ECI assignment number and return a string with proper encoding, not only UTF-8 or raw unicode.
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Implement color conversion from RGB to YUV422 family #24333
Related PR for extra: https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1104
Hi,
This patch provides CPU and OpenCL implementations of color conversions from RGB/BGR to YUV422 family (such as UYVY and YUY2).
These features would come in useful for enabling standard RGB images to be supplied as input to algorithms or networks that make use of images in YUV422 format directly (for example, on resource constrained devices working with camera images captured in YUV422).
The code, tests and perf tests are all written following the existing pattern. There is also an example `bin/example_cpp_cvtColor_RGB2YUV422` that loads an image from disk, converts it from BGR to UYVY and then back to BGR, and displays the result as a visual check that the conversion works.
The OpenCL performance for the forward conversion implemented here is the same as the existing backward conversion on my hardware. The CPU implementation, unfortunately, isn't very optimized as I am not yet familiar with the SIMD code.
Please let me know if I need to fix something or can make other modifications.
Thanks!
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
* remove Conformance from test names
* integrate neon optimization into default
* quick fix: define CV_NEON_AARCH64 0 for non NEON platforms
* remove var batch that leads to memory leak
* put neon code back to fast_gemm_kernels.simd
* reorganize code to reduce duplicate code
Add HAL implementation hooks to cv::flip() and cv::rotate() functions from core module #24233
Hello,
This change proposes the addition of HAL hooks for cv::flip() and cv::rotate() functions from OpenCV core module.
Flip and rotation are functions commonly available from 2D hardware accelerators. This is convenient provision to enable custom optimized implementation of image flip/rotation on systems embedding such accelerator.
Thank you
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Rewrite Universal Intrinsic code: float related part #24325
The goal of this series of PRs is to modify the SIMD code blocks guarded by CV_SIMD macro: rewrite them by using the new Universal Intrinsic API.
The series of PRs is listed below:
#23885 First patch, an example
#23980 Core module
#24058 ImgProc module, part 1
#24132 ImgProc module, part 2
#24166 ImgProc module, part 3
#24301 Features2d and calib3d module
#24324 Gapi module
This patch (hopefully) is the last one in the series.
This patch mainly involves 3 parts
1. Add some modifications related to float (CV_SIMD_64F)
2. Use `#if (CV_SIMD || CV_SIMD_SCALABLE)` instead of `#if CV_SIMD || CV_SIMD_SCALABLE`,
then we can get the `CV_SIMD` module that is not enabled for `CV_SIMD_SCALABLE` by looking for `if CV_SIMD`
3. Summary of `CV_SIMD` blocks that remains unmodified: Updated comments
- Some blocks will cause test fail when enable for RVV, marked as `TODO: enable for CV_SIMD_SCALABLE, ....`
- Some blocks can not be rewrited directly. (Not commented in the source code, just listed here)
- ./modules/core/src/mathfuncs_core.simd.hpp (Vector type wrapped in class/struct)
- ./modules/imgproc/src/color_lab.cpp (Array of vector type)
- ./modules/imgproc/src/color_rgb.simd.hpp (Array of vector type)
- ./modules/imgproc/src/sumpixels.simd.hpp (fixed length algorithm, strongly ralated with `CV_SIMD_WIDTH`)
These algorithms will need to be redesigned to accommodate scalable backends.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [ ] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [ ] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Fix tests writing to current work dir #24343
Several tests were writing files in the current work directory and did not clean up after test. Moved all temporary files to the `/tmp` dir and added a cleanup code.
Fixed CumSum dnn layer #24353Fixes#20110
The algorithm had several errors, so I rewrote it.
Also the layer didn't work with non constant axis tensor. Fixed it.
Enabled CumSum layer tests from ONNX conformance.
OpenVINO backend for INT8 models #23987
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
TODO:
- [x] DetectionOutput layer (https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/24069)
- [x] Less FP32 fallbacks (i.e. Sigmoid, eltwise sum)
- [x] Accuracy, performance tests (https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/24039)
- [x] Single layer tests (convolution)
- [x] ~~Fixes for OpenVINO 2022.1 (https://pullrequest.opencv.org/buildbot/builders/precommit_custom_linux/builds/100334)~~
Performace results for object detection model `coco_efficientdet_lite0_v1_1.0_quant_2021_09_06.tflite`:
| backend | performance (median time) |
|---|---|
| OpenCV | 77.42ms |
| OpenVINO 2023.0 | 10.90ms |
CPU: `11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-1135G7 @ 2.40GHz`
Serialized model per-layer stats (note that Convolution should use `*_I8` primitives if they are quantized correctly): https://gist.github.com/dkurt/7772bbf1907035441bb5454f19f0feef
---
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Optimization for parallelization when large core number #24280
**Problem description：**
When the number of cores is large, OpenCV’s thread library may reduce performance when processing parallel jobs.
**The reason for this problem:**
When the number of cores (the thread pool initialized the threads, whose number is as same as the number of cores) is large, the main thread will spend too much time on waking up unnecessary threads.
When a parallel job needs to be executed, the main thread will wake up all threads in sequence, and then wait for the signal for the job completion after waking up all threads. When the number of threads is larger than the parallel number of a job slices, there will be a situation where the main thread wakes up the threads in sequence and the awakened threads have completed the job, but the main thread is still waking up the other threads. The threads woken up by the main thread after this have nothing to do, and the broadcasts made by the waking threads take a lot of time, which reduce the performance.
**Solution：**
Reduce the time for the process of main thread waking up the worker threads through the following two methods:
• The number of threads awakened by the main thread should be adjusted according to the parallel number of a job slices. If the number of threads is greater than the number of the parallel number of job slices, the total number of threads awakened should be reduced.
• In the process of waking up threads in sequence, if the main thread finds that all parallel job slices have been allocated, it will jump out of the loop in time and wait for the signal for the job completion.
**Performance Test:**
The tests were run in the manner described by https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/HowToUsePerfTests.
At core number = 160, There are big performance gain in some cases.
Take the following cases in the video module as examples:
OpticalFlowPyrLK_self::Path_Idx_Cn_NPoints_WSize_Deriv::("cv/optflow/frames/VGA_%02d.png", 2, 1, (9, 9), 11, true)
Performance improves 191%:0.185405ms ->0.0636496ms
perf::DenseOpticalFlow_VariationalRefinement::(320x240, 10, 10)
Performance improves 112%:23.88938ms -> 11.2562ms
Among all the modules, the performance improvement is greatest on module video, and there are also certain improvements on other modules.
At core number = 160, the times labeled below are the geometric mean of the average time of all cases for one module. The optimization is available on each module.
overall | time(ms) | | | | | | |
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | --
module name | gapi | dnn | features2d | objdetect | core | imgproc | stitching | video
original | 0.185 | 1.586 | 9.998 | 11.846 | 0.205 | 0.215 | 164.409 | 0.803
optimized | 0.174 | 1.353 | 9.535 | 11.105 | 0.199 | 0.185 | 153.972 | 0.489
Performance improves | 6% | 17% | 5% | 7% | 3% | 16% | 7% | 64%
Meanwhile, It is found that adjusting the order of test cases will have an impact on some test cases. For example, we used option --gtest-shuffle to run opencv_perf_gapi, the performance of TestPerformance::CmpWithScalarPerfTestFluid/CmpWithScalarPerfTest::(compare_f, CMP_GE, 1920x1080, 32FC1, { gapi.kernel_package }) case had 30% changes compared to the case without shuffle. I would like to ask if you have also encountered such a situation and could you share your experience?
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
dnn: merge tests from test_halide_layers to test_backends #24283
Context: https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/24231#pullrequestreview-1628649980
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
