G-API: Fix async inference for OpenVINO backend #23884
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [ ] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [ ] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
G-API: Fix incorrect OpaqueKind for Kernel outputs #23843
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
#### Overview
The PR is going to fix several problems:
1. Major: `GKernel` doesn't hold `kind` for its outputs. Since `GModelBuilder` traverse graph from outputs to inputs once it reaches any output of the operation it will use its `kind` to create `Data` meta for all operation outputs. Since it essential for `python` to know `GTypeInfo` (which is `shape` and `kind`) it will be confused.
Consider this operation:
```
@cv.gapi.op('custom.square_mean', in_types=[cv.GArray.Int], out_types=[cv.GOpaque.Float, cv.GArray.Int])
class GSquareMean:
@staticmethod
def outMeta(desc):
return cv.empty_gopaque_desc(), cv.empty_array_desc()
```
Even though `GOpaque` is `Float`, corresponding metadata might have `Int` kind because it might be taken from `cv.GArray.Int`
so it will be a problem if one of the outputs of these operation is graph output because python will cast it to the wrong type based on `Data` meta.
2. Minor: Some of the OpenVINO `IR`'s doesn't any layout information for input. It's usually true only for `IRv10` but since `OpenVINO 2.0` need this information to correctly configure resize we need to put default layout if there no such assigned in `ov::Model`.
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [ ] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [ ] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
G-API: Implement InferROI, InferList, InferList2 for OpenVINO backend #23799
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [ ] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [ ] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
[G-API] Implement OpenVINO 2.0 backend #23595
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
Implemented basic functionality for `OpenVINO` 2.0 G-API backend.
#### Overview
- [x] Implement `Infer` kernel with some of essential configurable parameters + IR/Blob models format support.
- [ ] Implement the rest of kernels: `InferList`, `InferROI`, `Infer2` + other configurable params (e.g reshape)
- [x] Asyncrhonous execution support
- [ ] Remote context support
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake