Support C++20 standard #26590
Close https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/26589
Related https://github.com/opencv/opencv_contrib/pull/3842
Related: https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/20269
- do not arithmetic enums and ( different enums or floating numeric)
- remove unused variable
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
imgproc: C-API cleanup, drawContours refactor #25564
Changes:
* moved several macros from types_c.h to cvdef.h (assuming we will continue using them)
* removed some cases of C-API usage in _imgproc_ module (`CV_TERMCRIT_*` and `CV_CMP_*`)
* refactored `drawContours` to use C++ API instead of calling `cvDrawContours` + test for filled contours with holes (case with non-filled contours is simpler and is covered in some other tests)
#### Note:
There is one case where old drawContours behavior doesn't match the new one - when `contourIdx == -1` (means "draw all contours") and `maxLevel == 0` (means draw only selected contours, but not what is inside).
From the docs:
> **contourIdx** Parameter indicating a contour to draw. If it is negative, all the contours are drawn.
> **maxLevel** Maximal level for drawn contours. If it is 0, only the specified contour is drawn. If it is 1, the function draws the contour(s) and all the nested contours. If it is 2, the function draws the contours, all the nested contours, all the nested-to-nested contours, and so on. This parameter is only taken into account when there is hierarchy available.
Old behavior - only one first contour is drawn:
a
New behavior (also expected by the test) - all contours are drawn:
Fix harmless ASAN error. #24042
For an empty radius, &v[0] would be accessed (though the called functions would not use it due to v.size() being 0). Also add checks for emptyness and fix the first element checks, in case we get INT_MAX to compare to.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Added explicit cast to unsigned before doing the left shift.
This was caught by UBSan which reported things like:
drawing.cpp:361:22: runtime error: left shift of negative value -26214
drawing.cpp:383:22: runtime error: left shift of negative value -78642
* LineVirtualIterator
Proposal of LineVirtualIterator, an alternative to "LineIterator not attached to any mat".
This is basically the same implementation, replacing the address difference by a single "offset" variable. elemsize becomes irrelevant and considered to be 1. "step" is thus equal to size.width since no stride is expected.
* Update drawing.cpp
fixed warning
* improvement of LineVirtualIterator
instead of being too conservative, the new implementation gets rid of "offset/step" and only keeps a "Point currentPos" up to date.
left_to_right is renamed to forceLeftToRight as suggested (even for the old LineIterator)
assert() replaced by CV_Assert() (even for the old LineIterator)
* fixed implementation
+fixed last commit so that LineVirtualIterator gives at least the same results as LineIterator
+added a new constructor that does not require any Size, so that no clipping is done and iteration occurs from pt1 to pt2. This is done by adding a spatial offset to pt1 and pt2 so that the same implementation is used, the size being in that case the spatial size between pt1 and pt2
* Update imgproc.hpp
fixed warnings
* Update drawing.cpp
fixed whitespace
* Update drawing.cpp
trailing whitespace
* Update imgproc.hpp
+added a new constructor that takes a Rect rather than a Size. It computes the line pt1->pt2 that clips that rect.
Yet again, this is still based on the same implementation, thanks to the Size and the currentPosOffset that can artifically consider the origin of the rect at (0,0)
* revert changes
revert changes on original LineIterator implementation, that will be superseded by the new LineVirtualIterator anyway
* added test of LineVirtualIterator
* More tests
* refactoring
Use C++11 chained constructors
Improved code style
* improve test
Added offset as random test data.
* fixed order of initialization
* merged LineIterator and VirtualLineIterator
* merged LineIterator & VirtualLineIterator
* merged LineIterator & VirtualLineIterator
* merged LineIterator & VirtualLineIterator
* made LineIterator::operator ++() more efficient
added one perfectly predictable check; in theory, since ptmode is set in the end of the constructor in the header file, the compiler can figure out that it's always true/false and eliminate the check from the inline `LineIterator::operator++()` completely
* optimized Line() function
in the most common case (CV_8UC3) eliminated the check from the loop
Co-authored-by: Vadim Pisarevsky <vadim.pisarevsky@gmail.com>
* LineIterator witout a Mat
cv::LineIterator can be used without being attached to any cv::Mat, it only needs the size and type of data. An alternative constructor has been defined for that.
In that case, a LineIterator can no more be dereferenced with the * operator, but pos() still returns valid pixel positions.
It can be useful when LineIterator is just used to compute positions of pixels on a line, without requiring to build a Mat just for that.
Use case : with a dataset that would represent a huge image, pixel positions can be pre-computed before querying the dataset API.
* Update imgproc.hpp
removed trailing spaces
* Update drawing.cpp
fixed warning
