opencv/modules/gapi/doc/slides/gapi_overview.org
2019-12-26 06:45:03 -05:00

12 KiB
Raw Blame History

OpenCV 4.0 Graph API

G-API: What is, why, what's for?

OpenCV evolution in one slide

Version 1.x Library inception

  • Just a set of CV functions + helpers around (visualization, IO);

Version 2.x Library rewrite

  • OpenCV meets C++, cv::Mat replaces IplImage*;

Version 3.0: Welcome Transparent API (T-API)

  • cv::UMat is introduced as a transparent addition to cv::Mat;
  • With cv::UMat, an OpenCL kernel can be enqeueud instead of immediately running C code;
  • cv::UMat data is kept on a device until explicitly queried.

OpenCV evolution in one slide (cont'd)

Version 4.0: Welcome Graph API (G-API)

  • A new separate module (not a full library rewrite);
  • A framework (or even a meta-framework);
  • Usage model:

    • Express an image/vision processing graph and then execute it;
    • Fine-tune execution without changes in the graph;
  • Similar to Halide separates logic from platform details.
  • More than Halide:

    • Kernels can be written in unconstrained platform-native code;
    • Halide can serve as a backend (one of many).

Why G-API?

Why introduce a new execution model?

  • Ultimately it is all about optimizations;

    • or at least about a possibility to optimize;
  • A CV algorithm is usually not a single function call, but a composition of functions;
  • Different models operate at different levels of knowledge on the algorithm (problem) we run.

Why G-API? (cont'd)

Why introduce a new execution model?

  • Traditional every function can be optimized (e.g. vectorized) and parallelized, the rest is up to programmer to care about.
  • Queue-based kernels are enqueued dynamically with no guarantee where the end is or what is called next;
  • Graph-based nearly all information is there, some compiler magic can be done!

What is G-API for?

Bring the value of graph model with OpenCV where it makes sense:

  • Memory consumption can be reduced dramatically;
  • Memory access can be optimized to maximize cache reuse;
  • Parallelism can be applied automatically where it is hard to do it manually;

    • It also becomes more efficient when working with graphs;
  • Heterogeneity gets extra benefits like:

    • Avoiding unnecessary data transfers;
    • Shadowing transfer costs with parallel host co-execution;
    • Increasing system throughput with frame-level pipelining.

Programming with G-API

G-API Basics

G-API Concepts

  • Graphs are built by applying operations to data objects;

    • API itself has no "graphs", it is expression-based instead;
  • Data objects do not hold actual data, only capture dependencies;
  • Operations consume and produce data objects.
  • A graph is defined by specifying its boundaries with data objects:

    • What data objects are inputs to the graph?
    • What are its outputs?

A code is worth a thousand words

Traditional OpenCV   B_block BMCOL

#include <opencv2/core.hpp>
#include <opencv2/imgproc.hpp>

#include <opencv2/highgui.hpp>

int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
    using namespace cv;
    if (argc != 3) return 1;

    Mat in_mat = imread(argv[1]);
    Mat gx, gy;

    Sobel(in_mat, gx, CV_32F, 1, 0);
    Sobel(in_mat, gy, CV_32F, 0, 1);

    Mat mag, out_mat;
    sqrt(gx.mul(gx) + gy.mul(gy), mag);
    mag.convertTo(out_mat, CV_8U);

    imwrite(argv[2], out_mat);
    return 0;
}

OpenCV G-API   B_block BMCOL

#include <opencv2/gapi.hpp>
#include <opencv2/gapi/core.hpp>
#include <opencv2/gapi/imgproc.hpp>
#include <opencv2/highgui.hpp>

int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
    using namespace cv;
    if (argc != 3) return 1;

    GMat in;
    GMat gx  = gapi::Sobel(in, CV_32F, 1, 0);
    GMat gy  = gapi::Sobel(in, CV_32F, 0, 1);
    GMat mag = gapi::sqrt(  gapi::mul(gx, gx)
                          + gapi::mul(gy, gy));
    GMat out = gapi::convertTo(mag, CV_8U);
    GComputation sobel(GIn(in), GOut(out));

    Mat in_mat = imread(argv[1]), out_mat;
    sobel.apply(in_mat, out_mat);
    imwrite(argv[2], out_mat);
    return 0;
}

A code is worth a thousand words (cont'd)

What we have just learned?

  • G-API functions mimic their traditional OpenCV ancestors;
  • No real data is required to construct a graph;
  • Graph construction and graph execution are separate steps.

What else?

  • Graph is first expressed and then captured in an object;
  • Graph constructor defines protocol; user can pass vectors of inputs/outputs like

    cv::GComputation(cv::GIn(...), cv::GOut(...))
  • Calls to .apply() must conform to graph's protocol

On data objects

Graph protocol defines what arguments a computation was defined on (both inputs and outputs), and what are the shapes (or types) of those arguments:

Shape Argument Size
GMat Mat Static; defined during
graph compilation
GScalar Scalar 4 x double
GArray<T> std::vector<T> Dynamic; defined in runtime

GScalar may be value-initialized at construction time to allow expressions like GMat a = 2*(b + 1).

Customization example

Tuning the execution

  • Graph execution model is defined by kernels which are used;
  • Kernels can be specified in graph compilation arguments:

    #include <opencv2/gapi/fluid/core.hpp>
    #include <opencv2/gapi/fluid/imgproc.hpp>
    ...
    auto pkg = gapi::combine(gapi::core::fluid::kernels(),
                             gapi::imgproc::fluid::kernels(),
                             cv::unite_policy::KEEP);
    sobel.apply(in_mat, out_mat, compile_args(pkg));
  • OpenCL backend can be used in the same way;

  • NOTE: cv::unite_policy has been removed in OpenCV 4.1.1.

Operations and Kernels

Specifying a kernel package

  • A kernel is an implementation of operation (= interface);
  • A kernel package hosts kernels that G-API should use;
  • Kernels are written for different backends and using their APIs;
  • Two kernel packages can be merged into a single one;
  • User can safely supply his own kernels to either replace or augment the default package.

    • Yes, even the standard kernels can be overwritten by user from the outside!
  • Heterogeneous kernel package hosts kernels of different backends.

Operations and Kernels (cont'd)

Defining an operation

  • A type name (every operation is a C++ type);
  • Operation signature (similar to std::function<>);
  • Operation identifier (a string);
  • Metadata callback describe what is the output value format(s), given the input and arguments.
  • Use OpType::on(...) to use a new kernel OpType to construct graphs.
G_TYPED_KERNEL(GSqrt,<GMat(GMat)>,"org.opencv.core.math.sqrt") {
    static GMatDesc outMeta(GMatDesc in) { return in; }
};

Operations and Kernels (cont'd)

Implementing an operation

  • Depends on the backend and its API;
  • Common part for all backends: refer to operation being implemented using its type.

OpenCV backend

  • OpenCV backend is the default one: OpenCV kernel is a wrapped OpenCV function:

    GAPI_OCV_KERNEL(GCPUSqrt, cv::gapi::core::GSqrt) {
        static void run(const cv::Mat& in, cv::Mat &out) {
            cv::sqrt(in, out);
        }
    };

Operations and Kernels (cont'd)

Fluid backend

  • Fluid backend operates with row-by-row kernels and schedules its execution to optimize data locality:

    GAPI_FLUID_KERNEL(GFluidSqrt, cv::gapi::core::GSqrt, false) {
        static const int Window = 1;
        static void run(const View &in, Buffer &out) {
            hal::sqrt32f(in .InLine <float>(0)
                         out.OutLine<float>(0),
                         out.length());
        }
    };
  • Note run changes signature but still is derived from the operation signature.

Understanding the "G-Effect"

Understanding the "G-Effect"

What is "G-Effect"?

  • G-API is not only an API, but also an implementation;

    • i.e. it does some work already!
  • We call "G-Effect" any measurable improvement which G-API demonstrates against traditional methods;
  • So far the list is:

    • Memory consumption;
    • Performance;
    • Programmer efforts.

Note: in the following slides, all measurements are taken on Intel\textregistered{} Core\texttrademark-i5 6600 CPU.

Understanding the "G-Effect"

Memory consumption: Sobel Edge Detector

  • G-API/Fluid backend is designed to minimize footprint:
Input OpenCV G-API/Fluid Factor
MiB MiB Times
512 x 512 17.33 0.59 28.9x
640 x 480 20.29 0.62 32.8x
1280 x 720 60.73 0.72 83.9x
1920 x 1080 136.53 0.83 164.7x
3840 x 2160 545.88 1.22 447.4x
  • The detector itself can be written manually in two for loops, but G-API covers cases more complex than that;
  • OpenCV code requires changes to shrink footprint.

Understanding the "G-Effect"

Performance: Sobel Edge Detector

  • G-API/Fluid backend also optimizes cache reuse:
Input OpenCV G-API/Fluid Factor
ms ms Times
320 x 240 1.16 0.53 2.17x
640 x 480 5.66 1.89 2.99x
1280 x 720 17.24 5.26 3.28x
1920 x 1080 39.04 12.29 3.18x
3840 x 2160 219.57 51.22 4.29x
  • The more data is processed, the bigger "G-Effect" is.

Understanding the "G-Effect"

Relative speed-up based on cache efficiency

\begin{figure} \begin{tikzpicture} \begin{axis}[ xlabel={Image size}, ylabel={Relative speed-up}, nodes near coords, width=0.8\textwidth, xtick=data, xticklabels={QVGA, VGA, HD, FHD, UHD}, height=4.5cm, ] \addplot plot coordinates {(1, 1.0) (2, 1.38) (3, 1.51) (4, 1.46) (5, 1.97)}; \end{axis} \end{tikzpicture} \end{figure}

The higher resolution is, the higher relative speed-up is (with speed-up on QVGA taken as 1.0).

Resources on G-API

Resources on G-API

Repository

Documentation

Thank you!