12 KiB
OpenCV 4.0 Graph API
- G-API: What is, why, what's for?
- Programming with G-API
- Understanding the "G-Effect"
- Resources on G-API
- Thank you!
G-API: What is, why, what's for?
OpenCV evolution in one slide
Version 1.x – Library inception
- Just a set of CV functions + helpers around (visualization, IO);
Version 2.x – Library rewrite
- OpenCV meets C++,
cv::Mat
replacesIplImage*
;
Version 3.0: – Welcome Transparent API (T-API)
cv::UMat
is introduced as a transparent addition tocv::Mat
;- With
cv::UMat
, an OpenCL kernel can be enqeueud instead of immediately running C code; cv::UMat
data is kept on a device until explicitly queried.
OpenCV evolution in one slide (cont'd)
Version 4.0: – Welcome Graph API (G-API)
- A new separate module (not a full library rewrite);
- A framework (or even a meta-framework);
-
Usage model:
- Express an image/vision processing graph and then execute it;
- Fine-tune execution without changes in the graph;
- Similar to Halide – separates logic from platform details.
-
More than Halide:
- Kernels can be written in unconstrained platform-native code;
- Halide can serve as a backend (one of many).
Why G-API?
Why introduce a new execution model?
-
Ultimately it is all about optimizations;
- or at least about a possibility to optimize;
- A CV algorithm is usually not a single function call, but a composition of functions;
- Different models operate at different levels of knowledge on the algorithm (problem) we run.
Why G-API? (cont'd)
Why introduce a new execution model?
- Traditional – every function can be optimized (e.g. vectorized) and parallelized, the rest is up to programmer to care about.
- Queue-based – kernels are enqueued dynamically with no guarantee where the end is or what is called next;
- Graph-based – nearly all information is there, some compiler magic can be done!
What is G-API for?
Bring the value of graph model with OpenCV where it makes sense:
- Memory consumption can be reduced dramatically;
- Memory access can be optimized to maximize cache reuse;
-
Parallelism can be applied automatically where it is hard to do it manually;
- It also becomes more efficient when working with graphs;
-
Heterogeneity gets extra benefits like:
- Avoiding unnecessary data transfers;
- Shadowing transfer costs with parallel host co-execution;
- Increasing system throughput with frame-level pipelining.
Programming with G-API
G-API Basics
G-API Concepts
-
Graphs are built by applying operations to data objects;
- API itself has no "graphs", it is expression-based instead;
- Data objects do not hold actual data, only capture dependencies;
- Operations consume and produce data objects.
-
A graph is defined by specifying its boundaries with data objects:
- What data objects are inputs to the graph?
- What are its outputs?
A code is worth a thousand words
Traditional OpenCV B_block BMCOL
#include <opencv2/core.hpp>
#include <opencv2/imgproc.hpp>
#include <opencv2/highgui.hpp>
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
using namespace cv;
if (argc != 3) return 1;
Mat in_mat = imread(argv[1]);
Mat gx, gy;
Sobel(in_mat, gx, CV_32F, 1, 0);
Sobel(in_mat, gy, CV_32F, 0, 1);
Mat mag, out_mat;
sqrt(gx.mul(gx) + gy.mul(gy), mag);
mag.convertTo(out_mat, CV_8U);
imwrite(argv[2], out_mat);
return 0;
}
OpenCV G-API B_block BMCOL
#include <opencv2/gapi.hpp>
#include <opencv2/gapi/core.hpp>
#include <opencv2/gapi/imgproc.hpp>
#include <opencv2/highgui.hpp>
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
using namespace cv;
if (argc != 3) return 1;
GMat in;
GMat gx = gapi::Sobel(in, CV_32F, 1, 0);
GMat gy = gapi::Sobel(in, CV_32F, 0, 1);
GMat mag = gapi::sqrt( gapi::mul(gx, gx)
+ gapi::mul(gy, gy));
GMat out = gapi::convertTo(mag, CV_8U);
GComputation sobel(GIn(in), GOut(out));
Mat in_mat = imread(argv[1]), out_mat;
sobel.apply(in_mat, out_mat);
imwrite(argv[2], out_mat);
return 0;
}
A code is worth a thousand words (cont'd)
What we have just learned?
- G-API functions mimic their traditional OpenCV ancestors;
- No real data is required to construct a graph;
- Graph construction and graph execution are separate steps.
What else?
- Graph is first expressed and then captured in an object;
-
Graph constructor defines protocol; user can pass vectors of inputs/outputs like
cv::GComputation(cv::GIn(...), cv::GOut(...))
- Calls to
.apply()
must conform to graph's protocol
On data objects
Graph protocol defines what arguments a computation was defined on (both inputs and outputs), and what are the shapes (or types) of those arguments:
Shape | Argument | Size |
---|---|---|
GMat |
Mat |
Static; defined during |
graph compilation | ||
GScalar |
Scalar |
4 x double |
GArray<T> |
std::vector<T> |
Dynamic; defined in runtime |
GScalar
may be value-initialized at construction time to allow
expressions like GMat a = 2*(b + 1)
.
Customization example
Tuning the execution
- Graph execution model is defined by kernels which are used;
-
Kernels can be specified in graph compilation arguments:
#include <opencv2/gapi/fluid/core.hpp> #include <opencv2/gapi/fluid/imgproc.hpp> ... auto pkg = gapi::combine(gapi::core::fluid::kernels(), gapi::imgproc::fluid::kernels(), cv::unite_policy::KEEP); sobel.apply(in_mat, out_mat, compile_args(pkg));
-
OpenCL backend can be used in the same way;
-
NOTE:
cv::unite_policy
has been removed in OpenCV 4.1.1.
Operations and Kernels
Specifying a kernel package
- A kernel is an implementation of operation (= interface);
- A kernel package hosts kernels that G-API should use;
- Kernels are written for different backends and using their APIs;
- Two kernel packages can be merged into a single one;
-
User can safely supply his own kernels to either replace or augment the default package.
- Yes, even the standard kernels can be overwritten by user from the outside!
- Heterogeneous kernel package hosts kernels of different backends.
Operations and Kernels (cont'd)
Defining an operation
- A type name (every operation is a C++ type);
- Operation signature (similar to
std::function<>
); - Operation identifier (a string);
- Metadata callback – describe what is the output value format(s), given the input and arguments.
- Use
OpType::on(...)
to use a new kernelOpType
to construct graphs.
G_TYPED_KERNEL(GSqrt,<GMat(GMat)>,"org.opencv.core.math.sqrt") {
static GMatDesc outMeta(GMatDesc in) { return in; }
};
Operations and Kernels (cont'd)
Implementing an operation
- Depends on the backend and its API;
- Common part for all backends: refer to operation being implemented using its type.
OpenCV backend
-
OpenCV backend is the default one: OpenCV kernel is a wrapped OpenCV function:
GAPI_OCV_KERNEL(GCPUSqrt, cv::gapi::core::GSqrt) { static void run(const cv::Mat& in, cv::Mat &out) { cv::sqrt(in, out); } };
Operations and Kernels (cont'd)
Fluid backend
-
Fluid backend operates with row-by-row kernels and schedules its execution to optimize data locality:
GAPI_FLUID_KERNEL(GFluidSqrt, cv::gapi::core::GSqrt, false) { static const int Window = 1; static void run(const View &in, Buffer &out) { hal::sqrt32f(in .InLine <float>(0) out.OutLine<float>(0), out.length()); } };
- Note
run
changes signature but still is derived from the operation signature.
Understanding the "G-Effect"
Understanding the "G-Effect"
What is "G-Effect"?
-
G-API is not only an API, but also an implementation;
- i.e. it does some work already!
- We call "G-Effect" any measurable improvement which G-API demonstrates against traditional methods;
-
So far the list is:
- Memory consumption;
- Performance;
- Programmer efforts.
Note: in the following slides, all measurements are taken on Intel\textregistered{} Core\texttrademark-i5 6600 CPU.
Understanding the "G-Effect"
Memory consumption: Sobel Edge Detector
- G-API/Fluid backend is designed to minimize footprint:
Input | OpenCV | G-API/Fluid | Factor |
---|---|---|---|
MiB | MiB | Times | |
512 x 512 | 17.33 | 0.59 | 28.9x |
640 x 480 | 20.29 | 0.62 | 32.8x |
1280 x 720 | 60.73 | 0.72 | 83.9x |
1920 x 1080 | 136.53 | 0.83 | 164.7x |
3840 x 2160 | 545.88 | 1.22 | 447.4x |
- The detector itself can be written manually in two
for
loops, but G-API covers cases more complex than that; - OpenCV code requires changes to shrink footprint.
Understanding the "G-Effect"
Performance: Sobel Edge Detector
- G-API/Fluid backend also optimizes cache reuse:
Input | OpenCV | G-API/Fluid | Factor |
---|---|---|---|
ms | ms | Times | |
320 x 240 | 1.16 | 0.53 | 2.17x |
640 x 480 | 5.66 | 1.89 | 2.99x |
1280 x 720 | 17.24 | 5.26 | 3.28x |
1920 x 1080 | 39.04 | 12.29 | 3.18x |
3840 x 2160 | 219.57 | 51.22 | 4.29x |
- The more data is processed, the bigger "G-Effect" is.
Understanding the "G-Effect"
Relative speed-up based on cache efficiency
The higher resolution is, the higher relative speed-up is (with speed-up on QVGA taken as 1.0).
Resources on G-API
Resources on G-API
Repository
- https://github.com/opencv/opencv (see
modules/gapi
) - Integral part of OpenCV starting version 4.0;
Documentation
- https://docs.opencv.org/master/d0/d1e/gapi.html
- A tutorial and a class reference are there as well.